Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Riley1012 (talk · contribs) 11:06, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Firefangledfeathers (talk · contribs) 16:01, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Picking this one up! Thank you, Riley1012, for working on this article. First review items will be out soon. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 16:01, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• I want to note for the record that I'm accessing the Swedish-language sources via machine translation, and I'm very willing to hear it if this causes an embarrassing error. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 16:35, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it well written?

   A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:

   B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:

2. Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?

   A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:

   B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):

   Spot checked 7 sources (citations 14, 28, 36, 41, 51, 56, 73 as of this version as well as sources that came up naturally during the review. Minor issues described in review below.

   C. It contains no original research:

   D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:

   Spot checks and Earwig came up clean.

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:

   All aspects of a traditional athlete bio are present.

   B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):

4. Is it neutral?

   It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:

5. Is it stable?

   It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:

   Stability evident in article history.

6. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   All licenses at Commons pass a smell test.

   B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

   All good.

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

• Overall
  1. The bit about her 2013 medal being Sweden's first European one in 50 years is repeated in the lead and body. Is it true of all Swedish gymnastics, or just women's? Source seems to say it's limited to women. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 16:35, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

     Correct, it's just women's. This is fixed now. -Riley1012 (talk) 13:57, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Lead and infobox
  1. "She won the bronze medal on the uneven bars at the 2010 Summer Youth Olympics." Is the relative status of the Youth Olympics low enough to break the chronological order for this? Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 16:35, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

     I would say yes because it's a competition at the junior level. Normally we put senior results first in the lead then any significant junior results. -Riley1012 (talk) 13:57, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

     Ok! Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 15:55, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  2. I made some copyedits, and I'd appreciate your review: diff. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 16:49, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

     These look good to me. -Riley1012 (talk) 14:40, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  3. This article relies heavily on press releases from the Swedish Gymnastics Federation. This is not a disqualifying issue, as most of the press releases are being used to support straightforward facts (event results, qualifications, etc.) that are of obvious encyclopedic interest in an athlete's bio. That said, current citations 17 and 49 (article text supported: "This was only the third ..." and "She qualified for the uneven bars final at the World ...") are being used to cite claims about Adlerteg's place in history. Are there sources that can replace these press releases? Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 18:21, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

     Citations added. -Riley1012 (talk) 14:40, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• 2011
  1. "marking the first time two Swedish gymnasts": per source, "two Swedish female gymnasts"? Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 15:55, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

      Done -Riley1012 (talk) 22:42, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• 2012
  1. "the third time a Swedish female gymnast qualified": we should either say this was the fourth time or that Adlerteg was the third female gymnast. The latter is more easily supported by the citation (which doesn't mention Adomat being at the 1980 games). Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 16:49, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

      Done -Riley1012 (talk) 22:42, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• 2013
  1. "allergic reaction": she mentions this among other health issues that led to her decision. Consider listing the rest or summarizing with something like "health issues". Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 16:49, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

      Done -Riley1012 (talk) 22:42, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• 2014
  1. "the World Championships, the Swedish team finished 21st": mention that Adlerteg was on the team and that it was the gymnastics team specifically (in an earlier section, we use "Swedish team" to mean the whole athletic delegation). Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 16:49, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

      Done -Riley1012 (talk) 22:42, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• 2015–2017
  1. "at an FIG World Cup": this is a bit unclear. The source mentions a Swede winning gold at a 2009 world cup, but it's not clear whether it was an FIG one; the source never mentions FIG. Also, FIG hasn't been introduced yet as an acronym, and linking "FIG World Cup" to Artistic Gymnastics World Cup is unexpected. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 16:49, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

      Done -Riley1012 (talk) 22:42, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• 2018
  1. "qualify for a World event final since 1958": just "World" could apply to many competitions. Can we just say "World Championship event final"? Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 16:49, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

      Done -Riley1012 (talk) 22:42, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• 2019
  1. "all-around for the first time in five years": source says four years. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 17:34, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

      Done -Riley1012 (talk) 22:42, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Competitive history
  1. There's a stray citation below the table. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 15:55, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

      Done -Riley1012 (talk) 22:42, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Items in this section are based on guidelines that are not part of the GA criteria. You are free to work on them or not, and progress won't matter for GA status. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 16:35, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

1. Images could use brief alt text, mainly to indicate the ones in which she's demonstrating a gymnastics move. See MOS:ALT for guidance. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 16:35, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Done -Riley1012 (talk) 13:57, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2. Please review the links for overlinking. London and Tokyo, for example, do not need to be linked per MOS:OL. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 16:35, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Done -Riley1012 (talk) 13:57, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

3. In §2012, should we mention that she didn't advance to the Olympic finals? Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 16:49, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Done -Riley1012 (talk) 14:59, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

4. The heavy use of press releases is not a GA disqualifier, but the overall strength of the article could be improved by using more independent sources. Some press release citations are redundant and can be removed. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 18:21, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Done -Riley1012 (talk) 14:59, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

5. Per WP:SAYWHEREYOUGOTIT, consider using a parameter like "via" to indicate the citations that were retrieved from mynewsdesk.com. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 18:21, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Done -Riley1012 (talk) 14:59, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @Firefangledfeathers: just wondering if you had any further comments? -Riley1012 (talk) 23:30, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'll have more for you tomorrow! Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 01:58, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Firefangledfeathers: Sorry to bother you again, any updates? Riley1012 (talk) 17:14, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, Riley1012! Looks like I forgot to publish the most recent batch of items. More soon. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 15:55, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay Firefangledfeathers, I believe I have addressed everything. -Riley1012 (talk) 22:43, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Comments: @Firefangledfeathers and Riley1012: Where are we regarding the status of this article? It's been a while since this review was updated and with the GANR backlog drive coming up I want to make sure all potential articles are able to be included. IntentionallyDense ^(Contribs) 21:27, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  @IntentionallyDense: @Firefangledfeathers hasn't edited Wikipedia since 18 November, so I am not sure. I have addressed all of their comments and am essentially just waiting for them to pass it. Riley1012 (talk) 02:41, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  @Riley1012 I'd suggest asking someone over at WT:GAN to take a quick look and take over the review. You can mention that you've gotten through all of the feedback provided and just need someone to make sure the article meets criteria. IntentionallyDense ^(Contribs) 20:38, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  @Riley1012: Could you explain how Competitive history is sourced? Please also expand the lead to cover early life and retirement, if only briefly. CMD (talk) 07:46, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]