This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Caribbean, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to the countries of the Caribbean on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page to become familiar with the guidelines.CaribbeanWikipedia:WikiProject CaribbeanTemplate:WikiProject CaribbeanCaribbean
There's a lot of POV-ish writing in here. We need to replace emotive statements like "he threw away destruction of the French Fleet", "he prevented one of England's most prominent and capable sea commander from utterly destroying the French Fleet", "completely smashing the French Fleet to splinters", etc. There are more encyclopedic ways to write these things. Lord Cochrane obviously has a lot of fans, but we need to cite independant authority to make statements like, 'Gambier's "old-boy" stature was enough that he was acquitted'. 70.20.136.17020:31, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Since it is already acknowledged that this article incorporates text from the Encyclopædia Britannica Eleventh Edition, perhaps the article should borrow more heavily from that source. The Britannica does not contradict this article, but it does provide a more even-handed approach. For example it says, among other things, "A court-martial, assembled by order of a friendly admiralty, and presided over by a warm partisan, 'most honourably acquitted' him" on the charges against him, but goes on to say that "this decision was in reality nothing more than a party statement of the fact that a commander-in-chief, a supporter of the government, is not to be condemned or broken for not being a person of brilliant genius or dauntless resolution." Other passages in the Britannica back up statements in this article with perhaps less judgemental terms.--66.92.127.19414:31, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
POV amended 1st Nov 2009
Agreed, highly unsuitable language for a serious article and obviously written by a fan of Cochrane. I am also a fan of Cochrane, but also of Gambier, and of objective language. Have amended it to a more appropriate standard and expanded on several areas where necessary and added new references. Arthur Roberts 14:47, 1 November 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Arthur Roberts (talk • contribs)
Was his surname pronounced like it was an English word (GAM-bee-er, I suppose as if it were the comparative of an adjective "gamby") or in the French way (GAM-bee-yay, like the somewhat similar Garnier)? (I suppose gam-BEER like Tangier is also possible, though I assume unlikely.) Proteus(Talk)13:55, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]