Talk:James Franklin (meteorologist)
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Article Expansion
I rewrote this article using all the information I could find from reputable news organizations and official websites using google, of course. Some of the information may be behind a paywall (such as the NYT, WaPo, and AMS). I did not have any subscriptions to Miami newspapers, which may contain a wealth of information. Anyone in that area can contribute greatly to this article. @Sgerbic: Message text. Bdbart (talk) 16:14, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
- Great work! Sgerbic (talk) 16:34, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
Virtual lack of information
This is another article where notability may not even matter. There's virtually no information. If the project wishes to save this article, expand it significantly, if you can. Thegreatdr (talk) 00:02, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on James Franklin (meteorologist). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060618013018/http://www.bestofneworleans.com/dispatch/2002-10-15/news_feat.html to http://www.bestofneworleans.com/dispatch/2002-10-15/news_feat.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:19, 20 November 2017 (UTC)