This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Law This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. United States This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. History This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This Article is split content from Copyright law of the United States, which was growing quite long. Teachingaway (talk) 17:43, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"If CorenSearchBot is in error: Simply note so on this article's discussion page." This page is split off from the Copyright Law of the United States page. If anything, I suspect the blog post cited by CorenSearchBot copied some of it's contents from the original wikipedia article. Teachingaway (talk) 17:30, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, I just figured that out belatedly on my own. I've restored the original version you placed here. Sorry for the momentary lapse! —Largo Plazo (talk) 18:42, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• It would be rather ironic otherwise, no? Crow^Caw 20:42, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on History of copyright law of the United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150112171926/http://law.vanderbilt.edu/publications/journal-entertainment-technology-law/archive/download.aspx?id=2415 to http://law.vanderbilt.edu/publications/journal-entertainment-technology-law/archive/download.aspx?id=2415

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:19, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]