This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

United States: Texas High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Texas (assessed as High-importance). History Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Forestry (inactive) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Forestry, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.ForestryWikipedia:WikiProject ForestryTemplate:WikiProject ForestryForestry Ecology Low‑importance This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Ecology, an effort to create, expand, organize, and improve ecology-related articles.EcologyWikipedia:WikiProject EcologyTemplate:WikiProject EcologyEcology Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Dr. Blofeld proposed changing the article name to "Forestry in Texas" with the explanation

move to more appropriate sounding encyclopedic name

While I certainly am open to proposals for new names, this proposal does not describe the topic for several reasons:

• This article is about the history of the forests in general, not simply about the history of forestry.
• The article heavily covers the lumber industry which definitely is not appropriate to lump under the heading of "forestry" (i.e. some people might even consider that offensive).
• The proposed title does not address the fact tht it is a history article. As such it is misleading.
• Generally speaking it is standard practice to name a history article "History of X". This, of course, is not mandatory but it is helpful for WP to try to be consistent wherever it is reasonable to do so.

In any event, please do offer suggestions if you feel this name needs to be changed. One caveat: This is up for DYK right now so how 'bout we discuss before making radical changes like that?

--Mcorazao (talk) 21:37, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to see the Lost Pines have its own article, personally. — e. ripley\^talk 18:50, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. There are a lot of details in here that could be expanded into their articles. --Mcorazao (talk) 20:28, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lost Pines Forest is now stubbified. — e. ripley\^talk 02:13, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on History of Texas forests. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090918205348/http://co.jefferson.tx.us/Historical_Commission/hist.htm to http://www.co.jefferson.tx.us/historical_commission/hist.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:23, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]