This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Kent Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kent, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the county of Kent in South East England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.KentWikipedia:WikiProject KentTemplate:WikiProject KentKent-related Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Kent tasks: Here are some Kent related tasks you can do: Clean up an article: Here are automatically generated lists of articles needing cleanup sorted alphabetically and by category. Edit the Top and High importance articles. Refine/polish: Ashford, Royal Tunbridge Wells, Canterbury Expand:: List of churches in Kent, Maidstone Borough Council NPOV: K College Citation needed: Unreferenced Kent articles Cleanup/Copyedit: Kingdom of Kent Expert attention: Channel Tunnel, Bromley Civic Society Stubs: see Kent geography stubs articles Note: These articles may overlap with those on other related lists. If you would like to make a change, either do so yourself, or make a suggestion.

"In World War II doodlebugs were dropped on an oast house by Mill Lane and smashed its cowl, and a zeppallin used to be above Vines Lane." Doodlebugs (V1s) were pilotless explosive-filed aircraft and flew/fell rather than being dropped. Since the point of impact was only roughly determined at the time of launch in France it is highly unlikely that two V1s fell on the same oast house. Zeppelins were airships used in WW1 and not in WW2. The V1 carried 850kg of high explosive so if it fell on the oast house and exploded it would have damaged more than the cowl. The whole story is unsourced. So amended for now to "In World War II a doodlebug (V1) fell near an oast house by Mill Lane and smashed its cowl." Felix Charles (talk) 08:53, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I note that the Fosse Bank School article has been proposed for merger into this article. I Oppose the merger, as a former independent secondary school, the school is notable enough to sustain an independent article. It's long association with Tonbridge is another reason that it should not be merged here. Mjroots (talk) 21:16, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose merger - it is quite clearly notable enough in its own right. Tallguyuk (talk) 14:04, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Closed as Redirect - Schools aren't ever merged into articles. –Davey2010^Talk 20:48, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Hildenborough. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110725173137/http://history.touch2000.org.uk/stjohns to http://history.touch2000.org.uk/stjohns
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.kent.gov.uk/leisure-and-culture/explore-kent/cycling/Tonbridge-Castle-charity-ride.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20041109035232/http://www.thisishildenborough.co.uk/ to http://www.thisishildenborough.co.uk/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:50, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The inordinate amount of detail in this excessively long article about a minor village suggests that this might be a spoof article. Such articles are sometimes created for a bet or as a dare. 86.147.171.249 (talk) 02:15, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]