This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Books This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook Folklore Low‑importance This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Folklore, a WikiProject dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of the topics of folklore and folklore studies. If you would like to participate, you may edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project's page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to discussion.FolkloreWikipedia:WikiProject FolkloreTemplate:WikiProject FolkloreFolklore Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Mythology Low‑importance This article is supported by WikiProject Mythology. This project provides a central approach to Mythology-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the WikiProject page for more details.MythologyWikipedia:WikiProject MythologyTemplate:WikiProject MythologyMythology Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The ascertion that the precession was first realized around 4000 BCE is inaccurate. From the discussion on page 340 of the First Edition (1969) it would appear that the authors mention 4000 BC as the latest possible date for its realization. The general sense is that they feel the actual date to be much earlier, perhaps by many millennia. Here is but one small quote: "Its beginning has already been placed in the Neolithic, without setting limits in the past, let prehistoric archeologists decide" ---Hamlet's Mill (1969) page 340. The 4000 BC date is of special relevance due to the supposed ending of the Golden Age (giving rise to the various Flood myths), something of interest to those that follow the arguments put forth by the authors. Cla3mute (talk) 22:57, 22 January 2011 (UTC)cla3mute[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hamlet's Mill. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111203042816/http://members.westnet.com.au/Gary-David-Thompson/page9j.html to http://members.westnet.com.au/Gary-David-Thompson/page9j.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:24, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]