Gilwell Park is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
	This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on May 4, 2007.
Article milestones Date Process Result September 10, 2006 Featured article candidate Promoted March 12, 2007 Featured topic candidate Not promoted December 19, 2020 Featured article review Demoted
Current status: Former featured article

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

England Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Scouting Top‑importance Gilwell Park is part of the Scouting WikiProject, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Scouting and Guiding on the Wikipedia. This includes but is not limited to boy and girl organizations, WAGGGS and WOSM organizations as well as those not so affiliated, country and region-specific topics, and anything else related to Scouting. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ScoutingWikipedia:WikiProject ScoutingTemplate:WikiProject ScoutingScouting Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. This article was the project's Portal article of the month (October 2006).

Looks like a fair bit of work is needed if this is to retain FA status.♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:03, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Demote it now. We will look at it in a few years. --  Gadget850 ^talk 18:08, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm echoing what Dr. Blofeld said way back in 2014: this article needs work to keep the FA status.

Most notably:

• Article has several unsourced paragraphs (I'm tagging some in the mean time);
• We need smaller page ranges for Peter Roger's book. The book is used 30 times in the article, each time with the range pp. 5–46. That's the whole book, by the way;
• "Gilwell Park provides The Scout Association with over £1,000,000 a year through conference fees, accommodation fees, and sales of materials." - The source for that is from 2005, that's 15 years ago. All of the figures provided in the article are a bit dated;
• A third of this article reads like an ad for Scout Adventures, complete with accomodation and special events.

Article does not meet the current FA criteria. RetiredDuke (talk) 00:37, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]