Talk:Freedom of panorama
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | On 20 March 2014, Freedom of panorama was linked from Slashdot, a high-traffic website. (Traffic) All prior and subsequent edits to the article are noted in its revision history. |
|
||
This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
Where's indonesia?
despite india having this page in the subsection of this page regarding freedom of panorama in countries. So why there is no indonesia in this section? 114.124.247.248 (talk) 03:09, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
May 2024 law review publication for European Union
Just noting this recent publication.[1] RobbieIanMorrison (talk) 06:15, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
- @RobbieIanMorrison this must also be shared at the c:COM:VPC of Commons. Some mentioned cases (notably Spanish ones) may affect some images currently hosted there. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:45, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
Done See related Commons Village Pump entry. RobbieIanMorrison (talk) 08:01, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
References
- ^
Shtefan, Anna (May 2024). "Freedom of panorama in the EU: main features and hidden sides" (PDF). European journal of legal studies, OnlineFirst: 1–30. doi:10.2924/EJLS.2024.012. ISSN 1973-2937. Retrieved 2024-08-12.
30 pages.
FOP US section
Since there is now sufficient material for the U.S. section of Freedom of panorama article, is it feasible and logical to separate it into a standalone article (like, Freedom of panorama in the United States)? More things can be covered once it is separated into a standalone article, though I am not sure if it is within the bounds of enwiki article policy and if it can be sustained in the long term. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:04, 24 December 2024 (UTC)