Talk:Frederician Rococo
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Merge Discussion
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- This unreferenced article has been merged into Rococo as section with an an unreferenced tag. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 10:09, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
It seems to me that even if this article were fleshed out with all the information in de:Friderizianisches Rokoko, it still would be short enough be a subsection of the main topic page. Lexid523 (talk) 15:42, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- Yes, I'm inclined to agree; it doesn't look like there's enough here to merit a separate page. -Bryan Rutherford (talk) 16:17, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
- Against. The article currently has no sources and isn't fleshed out, until it turns into a proper article I think its best to leave it up and edit it further, then decide from there.TheTrainCrazyMan (talk) 00:20, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support Got a callup from the suggestbot. I must admit it is not an area I work in. Concerning the article, it is unsourced and has been there since 2006. It is unlikely to be updated any time soon. I think it will make a suitable merge source with some additional content from the German article and some suitable references, should they be available. It really needs to go and soon. I'm not able to do it justice, so I'm assuming somebody here will need to do it. scope_creepTalk 23:03, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.