This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Creationism: Young Earth creationism Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Creationism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Creationism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CreationismWikipedia:WikiProject CreationismTemplate:WikiProject CreationismCreationism Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Young Earth creationism task force (assessed as Top-importance). Skepticism High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Alternative views Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative views, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of significant alternative views in every field, from the sciences to the humanities. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion.Alternative viewsWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative viewsTemplate:WikiProject Alternative viewsAlternative views Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Religion Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Christianity Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Palaeontology Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Geology High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. History of Science Mid‑importance This article is part of the History of Science WikiProject, an attempt to improve and organize the history of science content on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. You can also help with the History of Science Collaboration of the Month.History of ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject History of ScienceTemplate:WikiProject History of Sciencehistory of science Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

Archive 1 (August 2004–May 2005) Archive 2 (May 2005–August 2007) Archive 3 (July–October 2007) Archive 4 (Nov 2007–Oct 2008) Archive 5 (Dec 2008–Oct 2009) Archive 6 (January 2010–)

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present.

There are three short-footnote references whose source information is missing in the article: Snelling 2006, Wilson 2001 and Mathews 2009. If any editors with more familiarity with the subject area than me can track the sources down, please add them in the "References" section at the end of the article. Thanks, Wham2001 (talk) 17:43, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done. tgeorgescu (talk) 23:26, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent – thank-you! Wham2001 (talk) 16:24, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The labelling as pseudoscience is not supported by the cited article, which does not provide an actual or multiple examples of the use of pseudoscience. Furthermore the cited article mixes up two examples for the use of pseudoscience. The article cited is not suitable to support the claim. 83.150.41.5 (talk) 14:03, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Which "cited article" do you mean? We have several sources for this ignorant claptrap being pseudoscience. --Hob Gadling (talk) 14:27, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The 1980 eruption of Mount Saint Helens caused many prominent geological events which unfolded just as Creation science and catastrophism says they would. This is documented on YouTube by several different respectable sources. AAEexecutive (talk) 23:37, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Geological catastrophes happen, mainstream science does not deny it. However, creation science is pseudoscience. tgeorgescu (talk) 00:06, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

YouTube is not a reliable source. Dimadick (talk) 09:18, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. If you would like to get some reliable secondary sources that agree with the theory you set forth and add them to the article, you may. OverzealousAutocorrect (talk) 19:11, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]