Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Adamstom.97 (talk · contribs) 11:02, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Grabbing this for review, shortly. - adamstom97 (talk) 11:02, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've had a read through the article, and I really just have one major issue. The accolades section has a pretty big awards table, but all that info is already over at the specific awards list article. That seems unnecessarily redundant. Generally, a when list of awards a split off, a short paragraph explaining the main ones is kept with the link to the main list. - adamstom97 (talk) 22:20, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Adamstom.97:, first and foremost thank you for taking the time to review this page. Uni and work (and just in need of a general break from editing) have consumed most of my time, so I apologize for not responding in a timely manner. I'll try to respond your concerns if not before the end of the day, at least by tomorrow morning. Cheers! DAP 💅 14:07, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The accolades section is looking good. I also just realised that some of the episode summaries are a bit long, which is a pretty basic thing that I think a good article should get right. Per MOS:TVPLOT, each summary should be no more than 200 words. - adamstom97 (talk) 14:19, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Adamstom.97: I believe everything is good to go now. DAP 💅 20:11, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, it's all looking pretty good. I'm happy to promote this now. Passed - adamstom97 (talk) 23:40, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]