Langbahn Team – Weltmeisterschaft

Talk:Fablehaven (novel)

Plot summary?

The plot summary is drastically incomplete. It cuts off near the beginning of the story. 76.27.43.136 (talk) 01:04, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Fablehaven (novel)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Whiteguru (talk · contribs) 03:52, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Starts GA Review. The review will follow the same sections of the Article. Thank you --Whiteguru (talk) 03:52, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 

Instructions: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment


Observations

   HTML document size: 101 kB
   Prose size (including all HTML code): 16 kB
   References (including all HTML code): 42 kB
   Wiki text: 22 kB
   Prose size (text only): 10237 B (1688 words) "readable prose size"
   References (text only): 4604 B
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  • This article is well written and follows MOS
  1. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  • Of 32 references, 2 go to Youtube. All other references checked; reliable sources proven.
  1. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  • Article stays on track; lede is strong and well written.
  1. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  • NPOV is preserved in this article.
  1. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  • Page created 8 December 2007
  • Page has 185 edits by 128 editors;
  • 90 day page views = 1,957 giving an average of 22 views per day
  • ClueBot NG has visited 5 times (reverting vandalism)
  • Internet Archive Bot has not been on this page since it was created;
  • Article originally named Fablehaven (book) and moved to Fablehaven (novel)
  • There are regular instances of vandalism up to end of 2020.
  • For 2021, the page has been stable. As this is a Youth fantasy novel, it may be that the page will continue to occasionally attract vandalism of the juvenile kind;
  1. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  • File:Fablehaven.jpg = copyright book cover = fair use claimed. Accepted.

  1. Overall:
  • A well written page about a Young adult/Children's novel, the first by this author. Plot summary is balanced, Backgound, Publication, Reception and Franchise are all well covered.
  • It may be a proactive move to run the IABot over the page and references.
  • This page has suffered vandalism of the juvenile kind. The page has fewer than 30 watchers, so management of this particular issue merits attention.
  • Nonetheless this is a pleasing article, well scribed. --Whiteguru (talk) 11:04, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 

 Passed

 

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted without image by Theleekycauldron (talk00:38, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Brandon Mull, author of Fablehaven
Brandon Mull, author of Fablehaven

Improved to Good Article status by Lazman321 (talk). Self-nominated at 14:49, 19 August 2021 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Article is a recent GA, sourced and long enough. No copyvio on Earwig and qpq has been provided. The only problem is that the hooks are a little bland. ALT0 and ALT1 are fairly basic. ALT2 has potential but it would have to be shortened and made a little pithier. Other than that this looks like a great nom! BuySomeApples (talk) 02:09, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

To T:DYK/P5 without image