Talk:Etienne Karita
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Hello! I just wanted to say good job on the article! I finished reviewing it and I personally think you did a great job and I hope my feedback helps you. Good job again! Routarchita (talk) 13:53, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
Did you know nomination
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by Flibirigit (talk) 06:07, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
... that Etienne Karita helped bring HIV research back to Rwanda after the genocide?- ALT1: ... that Etienne Karita helped bring HIV research back to Rwanda after the Rwandan genocide?
- Comment: Moved to the mainspace on June 19
Created by Globe17 (talk). Self-nominated at 14:07, 19 June 2020 (UTC).
- Hi! This is my first review, so I might mess up here and there. The article is new enough, but the source used to cite the hook fact in the article doesn't seem to actually be on the webpage provided. Let me know if I missed that on this website. Also note: I changed your hook to "Rwandan genocide" and linked it.
| General: Article is new enough and long enough |
|---|
Policy compliance:
- Adequate sourcing:
- Neutral:
- Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:
- Other problems:
- n
Hook eligibility:
- Cited: - n
- Interesting:
| QPQ: None required. |
Overall: 
Awsomaw (talk) 22:06, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Awsomaw: Hi, I'm just patrolling the old nominations section and saw this review. If you edit a hook significantly, as you did here, please post it as a new alt – in this case, ALT1. Frankly, I don't understand the hook the way it's written. It would be better to find a different fact from the article and write it in a hooky way. Best, Yoninah (talk) 23:02, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
- Got it. Thanks. Awsomaw (talk) 23:16, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
- Hi, looking back at my first DYK review here, it seems like the article doesn't actually meet WP:GNG, and the nominator is a student who is no longer contributing. I have left a message on the instructor's talk page, and will see if it is salvagable. Awsomaw (talk) 17:10, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
Looks like it's time to close this nomination as unsuccessful. Yoninah (talk) 11:52, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
- Closing nomination as abandoned. Flibirigit (talk) 06:07, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
