This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Volcanoes: Canada Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Volcanoes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of volcanoes, volcanology, igneous petrology, and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VolcanoesWikipedia:WikiProject VolcanoesTemplate:WikiProject VolcanoesWikiProject Volcanoes Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Volcanism of Canada task force (assessed as Mid-importance). Geology Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Canada: British Columbia / Geography / The 10,000 Challenge Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject British Columbia. This article is supported by WikiProject Geography of Canada. This article was created or improved during The 10,000 Challenge of WikiProject Canada, which started in November 2016 and is ongoing. You can help!!

This review is transcluded from Talk:Edziza Formation/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Volcanoguy (talk · contribs) 00:21, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 22:26, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Didn't realise I haven't claimed this. I'm on mobile, please expect comments tonight or tomorrow morning. ♦ JAGUAR  22:26, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• "comprise the central stratovolcano of Mount Edziza, as well as lava domes on the summit and flanks of the stratovolcano." - repetition, rephrase to simply comprise the central stratovolcano of Mount Edziza, as well as lava domes on its summit and flanks.

  Done. Volcanoguy 16:46, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• "similar to trachyte of the Kakiddi Formation which was erupted 0.3 million years ago" - the 'was' seems redundant here

• I'm not too sure about this. Volcanoguy 16:46, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• "The lower assemblage encloses up to 120-metre-long (390-foot) and 15-metre-thick (49-foot) lavas" - geology isn't my forté, but what does lavas mean here?

  Plural for lava. Volcanoguy 16:46, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• " northwesterly lobe partially encircles Tsekone Ridge and borders and overrides breccia of Pillow Ridge." - reads choppy

  I'm not sure of a better way to reword this. Volcanoguy 16:46, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well... as much as I don't like leaving short reviews, there's simply nothing else to add here. It's well written, comprehensive and simply put meets the GA criteria. As such I'm compelled to pass it, well done once again. ♦ JAGUAR  22:49, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Jaguar: I've responded to all of your comments. Volcanoguy 16:46, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]