Edward Millen has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones Date Process Result September 3, 2011 Good article nominee Listed

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Politics and Government This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance). Australia: New South Wales / Politics Low‑importance Edward Millen is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject New South Wales (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Australian politics (assessed as Low-importance). Need help improving this article? Ask a LibrarianWhat's this? at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of New South Wales. The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance. England Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Journalism Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Edward Millen/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Coemgenus (talk) 13:12, 13 August 2011 (UTC) Looks very good, but I have a few comments:[reply]

• You might want to link or explain "land agent".
  • Linked. Frickeg (talk) 12:16, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Exactly what sort of land reform did Millen espouse? The link doesn't help much.
  • Expanded - I couldn't find much on this. Frickeg (talk) 00:08, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Maybe some brief explanation of Australian federation would be useful to non-Australians in understanding the politics of the era. Just a sentence or two, nothing too elaborate.
  • Added a little bit at the start of the "state politics" section - how's that? Frickeg (talk) 00:08, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• "...elected in the second position" Are these multi-member districts? Some explanation, again, would help the non-Australian.
  • Reworded. Frickeg (talk) 12:16, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• You might want to explain the job of the Minister for Repatriation. Was it just about demobilization, or did he deal with veterans afterward, too?
  • Almost exclusively veterans; the portfolio eventually became Veterans' Affairs. I've tried to clarify the wording a little. Frickeg (talk) 00:08, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'll get to the rest of these on the weekend. Frickeg (talk) 12:16, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK. I probably won't be able to review them until then, anyway. --Coemgenus (talk) 12:53, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• These changes are all good. I'm a little concerned about how closely the "Early life" section follows the Rutledge article -- some of the sentences are very close to the source. I understand that there's going to be some overlap in a chronological history -- things happened in that order, no matter how they're sourced -- but a little re-arranging might help. --Coemgenus (talk) 15:54, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hopefully addressed. Frickeg (talk) 13:20, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    • Works for me. --Coemgenus (talk) 22:03, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]