This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Ethnic groups Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ethnic groups, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to ethnic groups, nationalities, and other cultural identities on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ethnic groupsWikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groupsTemplate:WikiProject Ethnic groupsEthnic groups Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Ethnic groups open tasks: Here are some open WikiProject Ethnic groups tasks: Meta-tasks: Place the {{Ethnic groups}} template on the talk page of articles within the scope of this project. Resolve the disparity in importance rankings among different ethnic groups Articles about ethnic groups that currently have issues needing resolution: Category:Unassessed Ethnic groups articles Category:Ethnic groups articles needing merge action Category:Ethnic groups articles needing infoboxes Category:Ethnic groups articles needing reassessment Category:Ethnic groups articles needing attention Iyer Peruvian people Start an article: Wikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groups/Article requests Feel free to edit this list or discuss these tasks. China Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Russia: Demographics & ethnography Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the demographics and ethnography of Russia task force. Soviet Union Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soviet Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Soviet UnionWikipedia:WikiProject Soviet UnionTemplate:WikiProject Soviet UnionSoviet Union Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Central Asia High‑importance Dungan people is part of WikiProject Central Asia, a project to improve all Central Asia-related articles. This includes but is not limited to Afghanistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Mongolia, Tajikistan, Tibet, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Xinjiang and Central Asian portions of Iran, Pakistan and Russia, region-specific topics, and anything else related to Central Asia. If you would like to help improve this and other Central Asia-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.Central AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Central AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Central AsiaCentral Asia High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Their ancestors fled there NOT from persecution but for famine in China in the 19th century Back then, Russian czar gave them land to encourage them to stay. Your definition can not explain why only few Hui people are outside of China. comment by User:129.120.61.116 moved from main article

User:Daduzi, I reverted your change of linking 'Chinese' to Han Chinese; now it's back to linking to Chinese people. Dungan people are mostly of Hui origin rather than Han (though it's likely there are some recent Han Muslim converts among them, and maybe even Sinicized non-Han Muslim minorities). Better just to call them as "Chinese" (something like zhonghua minzu) unless we can find specific genetic data. (The Dungan themselves generally describe themselves as being exclusively descended from Hui.) Pls yell to me if you disagree. cab 14:43, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The reason I changed it to Han Chinese is because the Hui minority is ethnically Han but are counted as a separate minority on the basis of religion. This is what distinguishes them from other muslim minorities like the Uighurs. I'll agree that my initial wording was bad, though, and should have been more specific. Perhaps change to "Dungan (Chinese: 東干族; pinyin: dōng gān zú; Дунгане) is a term used in territories of the former Soviet Union to refer to a Muslim people of Han Chinese ethnicity."? --Daduzi ^talk 15:49, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I've gone ahead and changed it. If you don't like it feel free to change it to something else, but try to avoid using Chinese people, as that is a disambiguation page (see WP:DPL). Thanks. --Daduzi ^talk 17:36, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hui also have some genetic differences from Han, especially in the paternal line. E.g. [1],[2]. Also a paper on Dungan genetics here at [3]. (Not easy to find because e.g. searching for dungan genetics gets you lots of papers by Irish guys named Dr. Dungan). Sorry not to get back sooner. Maybe change it to Hui? cab 02:01, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Very interesting, I'd always been told that Hui and Han were ethnically identical but evidently I'd been misinformed. I've gone ahead and done another edit which I hope better reflects this new (for me) information. --Daduzi ^talk 02:36, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hui share one "cultural" similarity to Han that they do not share with the Turkic and other Muslim groups in XJ: they appear to rely on the lunar calendar. This is by inference from the patterns of age-heaping in the censuses of China, in which Hui, like Han, have a "preference" for birth years that are favorable animal years, while Uighurs and Kazakhs show no such preference. I can provide a published source from a conference on the 1990 Chinese census if any0ne is interested, but it's fairly obscure.--Mack2 16:43, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am copying this from "my talk" FYI.--Mack2 16:19, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dungan

Hey Mack2. Thanks for your edit on Dungan. However, I reverted it, since both those pages were already linked from elsewhere in the article. The See Also section is usually for articles which may be somewhat related to the topic of the article and/or interesting to the reader for further exploration, but didn't need to be linked from within the body of the article itself. Also. Links to versions of the same article in another language appear in the left sidebar when you're viewing the page; they're usually grouped together near the bottom when you're editing it. Cheers. cab 15:53, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

OK, but to be honest the English-language articles are much more confusing than they ought to be, and that's why I deliberately provided the seemingly redundant cross-links. There are now separate articles on Hui and Dungan. But these these are just two names for the same ethnic group. I think these articles ought to be consolidated. It is misleading to say that Dungans are the name used in the (former) Soviet Union to describe a group of Chinese Muslims, for example, since the name "Dungan" is also used by Uighur and other Turkic peoples in both Xinjiang and in Kyrgyzstan and in Russia to refer to the "Hui." On a visit to Xinjiang, I heard a Uighur describe the people as "Dungan," for example.

I'm not skilled enough to do a consolidation, but I feel there needs to be a consolidation both in substance and the cross-links to avoid the wrong implication. Perhaps you can take it on? Thanks.--Mack2 16:14, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

Added: It seems to me that one article on Dungans (Hui), with redirection as needed, would suffice. And then the language, religion, culture can be described basically once, with (if needed) separate sections on Hui (Dungans) in China and Dungans (Hui) in the former Soviet republics.--Mack2 16:37, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have no stong feelings either way on this particular issue as things stand, but I do want to stress that any consolidated article should be named Hui, as that is by some margin the more common English name for the Dungan/Hui. --Daduzi ^talk 22:55, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with you for at least two reasons. First, Hui is apparently the name that the people give to themselves, and it's consistent with the English-language transiteration of their name. Second, the Hui article is much more developed right now than the Dungan article (the Dungan article in the .RU site is also very preliminary). As I mentioned above, however, I am not the one to do the consolidating, because I don't know my way around enough yet. Perhaps we should propose the consolidation to the principal authors of the Hui article? I'm not sure who that would be. Any ideas how to proceed? I think it would be wise first to wait for more contributors to respond to this idea before it moves too far.--Mack2 00:21, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'd oppose consolidation. There's something of a dilemma here. Basically, there's a group of of people in the former Soviet Union speaking a language that's definitely not Chinese, (though it's as related as Urdu is to Hindi), and calling themselves "Hui". Separately, there's a group of people in China speaking a language that definitely *is* Chinese, and calling themselves "Hui". Turks refer to both groups as "Dungan" and their language as "Dungan language". But English and Chinese speakers both make a distinction between "Dungan" speaking in "Dungan language" and "Hui" speaking in Chinese. Also, if a bunch of Hui in Beijing picked up tomorrow and moved to Kazakhstan, Chinese people would still call them Hui, not Dungan. If you referred to them as Dungan, both English and Chinese speakers would get the (incorrect) impression that they were native speakers of Dungan language who grew up there. cab 03:04, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm trying to think of some parallels. I'm not sure the defining characteristic is the language they are speaking (as opposed to ethnic origins and self-identification or consciousness), and for that matter I'm not sure the Hui in Kyrgyzstan and the Hui in Xinjiang (as one location) are speaking a different language. My hunch is they're speaking slight variants of one language, with variation due to the physical-geographic separation over many generations, not to mention their being influenced by the ethno-linguistic contexts within which they have lived (but we're not talking about different languages or even different dialects -- just the introduction of loan words from languages of regions in which they reside). But what do I know for sure? I think I know that there are no schools teaching "Hui" in either China or anywhere else -- at least I'm pretty sure of this. There weren't any in Xinjiang (XJ) last time I was there 10 years ago, when they were teaching in Mandarin, Uighur, and Kazakh but not Tajik or Hui. So Hui kids must be learning Mandarin and probably only Mandarin as a literary language. There are about 9 million Hui in China, and about 10% of those live in XJ; and there are larger non-Han groups that don't have any schools in their own language, perhaps because they lost it (e.g., Zhuang).

But I would bet that Hui in XJ and Hui in Kyrgyzstan (where some 50K Hui reside) have common relatives and interests but things would go back some generations. And I would bet that all the Hui in former Soviet Central Asia and Russia came from China. My recollection is that the Hui were always tabulated with the "foreign" nationalities in the Soviet censuses, and tabulated as Dungane and not as Kitaitsy (Chinese). I did just check the Russian 2002 census online (http://www.perepis2002.ru/index.html?id=17), which shows 801 Dungans and 34,577 Chinese (and the Dungans are about 52% urban, while the Chinese are 96% urban). So nobody is confusing these two nationalities in Russia, either. Further, I would guess that since the end of the USSR, there has been increased contact between Hui in China and the former Soviet Union. Certainly there are itinerant traders who are moving with their goods from one bazaar to another in the region, e.g., I've seen Kyrgyz moving with huge bundles of goods on a 24-hr trip between Alma-Aty and Kashgar, all to trade.

But I would still guess a Hui is a Dungan and a Dungan is a Hui, and that unless you wrote an article with no info about origins and customs, you would find the need write the same thing about the origins of the Hui-Dungans in China and Hui-Dungans in former Soviet Central Asia; but of course their history and experiences are different -- in the same way that, say Kurds in Iraq have a different experience from Kurds in Iran, Azerbaijan, and Turkey but they are still Kurds and they have no homeland.

But even if you keep these articles separate, and I'm not decided either til more evidence is in, my hunch is that you would want to do a lot more to identify the "origins" of Hui-Dungans in Soviet Central Asia and Russia, so that you'd be able to talk about how their experiences diverged from a more or less common background. For example, there's a lot of "prehistory" about the Hui in this article, the accuracy of which I can't vouch for: http://www.china.org.cn/e-groups/shaoshu/shao-2-hui.htm

One thing I can see at this stage is that the Dungan article in English and the Dungan article in Russian are basically stubs. Perhaps if someone were to expand those articles substantially with more information about culture, language, history, economics, etc., then the rumpiness of the article on the Hui in the former Soviet Union would be less apparent.--Mack2 03:37, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ADDED: Here's what the Russian article says. I'll give a quick and dirty translation. Note that they don't differentiate between the Hui in China and the Hui in Central Asia except in their writing systems.

Дунгане — народ, проживающий в Китае, Киргизии, южном Казахстане, Узбекистане. Самоназвание хуэй. Дунгане говорят на диалекте китайского языка. Живущие в странах СНГ используют письменность на основе кириллицы. Исповедуют ислам ханафитского толка, являются потомками мусульман, бежавших из Китая в конце 18 века. (Dungans -- a people living in China, Kirgizia, south Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan. They call themselves Hue. Dungans speak in a dialect of the Chinese language. Those who live in the countries of the Commonwealth of Independent States (SNG) use a writing system based on the Cyrillic alphabet. They are believers in Islam of the Hanafi school, and are Muslims by descent, having fled China at the end of the 19th Century.)

Дунгане занимаются земледелием, торговлей на рынках. Во всех крупных городах региона популярны кафе дунганской кухни. (Dungans work in agriculture and trading in the bazaars (markets). In all large cities in the region cafes with Dungan cooking are popular.) В киргизском городе Каракол сохранилась деревянная дунганская мечеть начала XX века. (In the Kyrgyz city of Karakol, an ancient Dungan mosque is preserved from the beginning of the 20th century.) В России согласно переписи 2002 года проживает 800 дунган. (According to the 2002 census, 800 Dungans live in Russia.)

Anyway, I think the problem is that although the Dungan might be a subset of the Hui, not all Hui can be classified as Dungan (particularly Hui living outside of Northwest China) cab 10:25, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I live in Xinjiang, and I can tell you that the Dungans of the former Soviet Union (who call themselves Hui) and the Hui of Northwestern China (who are called Dungan by Uyghurs and Kazakhs) are most definitely speaking the same language. It's misleading to refer to "Chinese" as spoken in China as a uniform language because it contains a wide variety of dialects. The Hui in Xinjiang speak amongst themselves in a unique dialect refered to as "Hui zu hua" or "Hui Hui hua" that is mutually intelligable with "putonghua" Mandarin in the same way that other dialects of northern China (Shangdong hua, Dongbei hua, Gansu hua, etc) are also mutually intelligable, but have their own distinctive pronunciation patterns, grammatical patterns, vocabulary and slang.

The dialect of the Northwestern Hui people is largely derived from Mandarin dialects spoken in Shaanxi and Gansu provinces, not unlike the Dungan "language" of Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan. The dialect spoken by the Hui isn't recognized as a distinctive language separate from "Chinese" (Zhong Wen) for the same reason that none of the other dialects of Chinese are - It's part of a campaign to promote "putonghua" Mandarin as the common Chinese language as to reduce barriers to communication. Southern Chinese languages, like Cantonese, Minnan Chinese, and Wu Chinese, which unlike the Northwestern Hui dialect aren't mutually intelligable with Mandarin at all, are not recognized as minority languages in China either.

While it's true that the Dungan language of the Central Asian republics has diverged from the Hui dialects due to isolation, influence from Russian and Turkic languages, and use of the Cyrillic writing system, so have the Kazakh, Kyrgyz, and Uyghur languages as spoken on both sides of the border. Most Kazakhs from Kazakhstan cannot read the written form of Kazakh used in China (derived from the Perso-Arabic alphabet), nor can most Kazakhs in China read the Cyrillic alphabet used in Kazakhstan. Similarly, many newer vocabulary words differ between Kazakhs and Uyghurs in China and their neighbors in Kazakhstan. For example, words for vegetables and fruits in Xinjiang Kazakh typically derive from Chinese and the same words in Kazakhstan come from Russian, as the Kazakhs were traditionally a non-agricultural people. Just last week, I had to step in and help a Chinese Kazakh friend talking about hamburgers with a friend from Kazakhstan (he said "hanbao," a Chinese word, which differs from the word the Kazakhstanis know as "gambyrger").

：As for the question of whether or not "Dungan" is applicable to all Hui people, I'd agree that the Hui people of Northwestern China, from Shaanxi to Xinjiang and into the former Soviet Union, have their own distinctive culture and history and the word "Dungan" originally applied only to them. Nowadays, however, due to the official conception of Hui people as promoted by China, I'd question the notion that Uyghurs working and travelling in Guangzhou or Beijing would not also refer to the Hui people they encounter there as "Dungans" if speaking about them in their own language. 124.119.153.69 (talk) 10:52, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Want to get opinions from other users --- any comments on whether the navigation box {{Overseas Chinese}} should be placed at the bottom of this article? Cheers, cab 10:25, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

For dedicated editors of this page: The "Related Groups" info was removed from all {{Infobox Ethnic group}} infoboxes. Comments may be left on the Ethnic groups talk page. Ling.Nut 17:04, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What about Miao and Hmong, Jing people and Vietnamese, Tajiks in China and Tajiks. 218.188.90.194 (talk) 02:01, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've explained my rationale earlier here and on the Hui discussion thread. Merging Hui into Dungan would be sort of like merging Mexicans into an article on Mexican Americans. "Dungans" call themselves Hui, whether they live in China, Kyrgzstan, Uzbekistan, or Russia.--Mack2 (talk) 17:48, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disagree, Dungans and Hui have separate identities. Mar de Sin ^{Speak up!} 18:38, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree with merging the two articles. The Hui and Dungan are related, but not completely interchangeable. David Straub (talk) 03:09, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose according to the article, the two groups separated a while ago, and the Dungan have acquired many unique characteristics since then (Cyrillic script, Arabic and Russian derived words) 70.51.9.57 (talk) 09:40, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose as per above.--Bothnia (talk) 13:05, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose they don't identify themselves with Hui. --Voidvector (talk) 07:31, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment I support moving this article into Overseas Hui people since they call themself حُوِ ذَو, the same as Hui people in China. --虞海 (Yú Hǎi) (talk) 18:42, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is completely fallacious:

"It is generally believed that the origins of Islam is due to the fact that Dungans are descendants of Arabs that moved to Asia thousands of years ago during the silk road period. This is also why many Dungans have Arabic names."

The entire Muslim world has "Arabic names". Yet, only less than 10% of the Muslims in the world are Arabs. Is a European Bosniak with the name "Djevat" (from "Jawad"), or "Mehmet" (from "Muhammad") an Arab?

As stated in this entry, "the origins of Islam" have nothing to do with the Dungan population. This is poor wording. Also, Islam has not been around for "thousands of years", nor was the "silk road period" where the Arabs were trading on that route "thousands of years ago".

Islam amongst the Dungans is a combination of two factors:

1) Arab preachers along the Silk Road who were given freedom to preach by T'ang Emperor Gaozong.

2) Mass conversions to Islam by the Mongols, Berke Khan and the Golden Horde in particular, as well as mass conversions by the populations in their territories,I'm changing this erroneous statement in this Wiki entry. Thank you.

There's so much extra space at the bottom. Someone (please) fix it.68.148.164.166 (talk) 08:28, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Another claim is they called themselves 东岸人 when asked, without realizing the "asker"s were asking their ethnic group. Then the name Dong'an became Dungan by misinformation. --虞海 (Yú Hǎi) (talk) 18:48, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at the history for Sep 17-18, 2011, one can see a large amount of (mostly sourced) material removed, and some (both sourced and un-sourced) material added, by User:Arash Shah and 14.104.179.19. I can't research this seriously at the moment, to figure what makes sense and what does not. But note, for example, the replacement of the census-derived numbers in the summary table with larger, round numbers, and adding Farsi among the language spoken (hardly common, I am sure). -- Vmenkov (talk) 15:56, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that the removal of sourced material was excessive. Also the article now gave the wrong impression that these people call themselves Dungan, which is not true. They call themselves Hui and the word Dungan is used mainly by Turkic and Tajik neighbors to refer to this group. I corrected this in first sentence but it could be made more clear later as well. Also, Russians called them Dungans, but even in Soviet Union and post-Soviet Central Asian states they called themseves Hui. ~Mack2~ (talk) 05:23, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:Lead I have identified that this lede does not provide an accessible overview of the article's key points, without being too short, and so used the template {{Inadequate lead}} to tag the section for improvement. I hope that others will assist in addressing the numerous deficiencies within this article. Note: I also applied the Talk Header to this talk page... JDanek007^Talk 20:39, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Dungan people. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141006125801/http://www.perepis2002.ru/index.html?id=17 to http://www.perepis2002.ru/index.html?id=17
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111217151026/http://2001.ukrcensus.gov.ua/eng/results/general/nationality/ to http://2001.ukrcensus.gov.ua/eng/results/general/nationality/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:19, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Dungan people. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.ecsocman.edu.ru/images/pubs/2005/06/13/0000213102/010Alekseenko.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081020191853/http://www.hum.uit.no/a/trond/sintr.html to http://www.hum.uit.no/a/trond/sintr.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110721222045/http://makuielys.info/wenz1/show.php?type=szzlsdmslmwh&id=1051383104 to http://makuielys.info/wenz1/show.php?type=szzlsdmslmwh&id=1051383104
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081020191853/http://www.hum.uit.no/a/trond/sintr.html to http://www.hum.uit.no/a/trond/sintr.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:38, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Dungan people. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.ecsocman.edu.ru/images/pubs/2005/06/13/0000213102/010Alekseenko.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070701154321/http://www.zhambyl.stat.kz/main.php?action=perepis&article=4&lang=rus to http://www.zhambyl.stat.kz/main.php?action=perepis&article=4&lang=rus
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070630174635/http://www.nanzan-u.ac.jp/SHUBUNKEN/publications/afs/pdf/a916.pdf to http://www.nanzan-u.ac.jp/SHUBUNKEN/publications/afs/pdf/a916.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060424085207/http://en.chinabroadcast.cn/1857/2004-7-9/53@130293.htm to http://en.chinabroadcast.cn/1857/2004-7-9/53@130293.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060627071501/http://www.assamblea.kg/nkc_dungan_engl.htm to http://www.assamblea.kg/nkc_dungan_engl.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:22, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]