Langbahn Team – Weltmeisterschaft

Talk:Cyclone Manou

Good articleCyclone Manou has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starCyclone Manou is part of the 2002–03 South-West Indian Ocean cyclone season series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 20, 2013Good article nomineeListed
July 2, 2013Good topic candidatePromoted
On this day...A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on May 2, 2023.
Current status: Good article

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Cyclone Manou/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: TheAustinMan (talk · contribs) 14:32, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lead

  • The lead links to St Brandon. Although that's the title of the article, is that appropriate nomenclature? Normally islands like these are written as St. Brandon or Saint Brandon.
  • "After becoming extratropical on May 10, Manou dissipated three days later." The meteorological history may hint at this but does not explicitly state this.
    • Isn't the current wording close enough? "...on May 9 the cyclone weakened to tropical storm status. The next day Manou weakened to a tropical depression... MFR continued tracking the storm until it dissipated on May 13." ? --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 15:00, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • The infobox caption reads "Cyclone Manou near landfall" though if I read correctly Manou only neared the coast before stalling and moving southwards. TheAustinMan(Talk·Works) 14:32, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Meteorological history

Impact

See also

Bot Checkers

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cyclone Manou. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:24, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]