This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Palaeontology High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Amphibians and Reptiles High‑importance Crocodylomorpha is part of WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles, an effort to make Wikipedia a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource for amphibians and reptiles. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Amphibians and ReptilesWikipedia:WikiProject Amphibians and ReptilesTemplate:WikiProject Amphibians and Reptilesamphibian and reptile High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

I have outcommented the Bristol U taxo scheme as it is incomplete, inconsistent, obsolete and does not agree with what is used elsewhere on WP. Didn't want to delete it as it is a hefty chunk of text. I have also rm'ed the aaancient and totally obsolete "suborders" from the taxobox and mv them to an in-text discussion, and added a few words on accepted and possible order-level clades. Dysmorodrepanis 01:08, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The cladogram starts with "Crocodyliformes", this is not the same as "Crocodylomorpha"! 81.165.230.142 19:53, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Crocodylomorpha. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071226224455/http://www.palaeos.com/Vertebrates/Units/Unit290/290.100.html to http://www.palaeos.com/Vertebrates/Units/Unit290/290.100.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071226224455/http://www.palaeos.com/Vertebrates/Units/Unit290/290.100.html to http://www.palaeos.com/Vertebrates/Units/Unit290/290.100.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:02, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]