This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computer Security: Computing High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer Security, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computer security on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer SecurityWikipedia:WikiProject Computer SecurityTemplate:WikiProject Computer SecurityComputer Security High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Computing (assessed as High-importance). Things you can help WikiProject Computer Security with: Article alerts will be generated shortly by AAlertBot. Please allow some days for processing. More information... Review importance and quality of existing articles Identify categories related to Computer Security Tag related articles Identify articles for creation (see also: Article requests) Identify articles for improvement Create the Project Navigation Box including lists of adopted articles, requested articles, reviewed articles, etc. Find editors who have shown interest in this subject and ask them to take a look here. Computing: Software / Websites / CompSci / Security Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Websites (assessed as High-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Computer science (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Computer Security (assessed as High-importance). Things you can help WikiProject Computer science with: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Requested articles/Applied arts and sciences/Computer science, computing, and Internet Cleanup : Computer science articles needing attention Computer science articles needing expert attention Copyedit : Computing Expand : Computer science Infobox : Computer science articles without infoboxes Maintain : Timeline of computing 2020–present Photo : Find pictures for the biographies of computer scientists (see List of computer scientists) Computing articles needing images Stubs : Computer science stubs Unreferenced : WikiProject Computer science/Unreferenced BLPs Project-related : Tag all relevant articles in Category:Computer science and sub-categories with {{WikiProject Computer science}} Internet Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Can anyone give a explanation of how Mozilla CSP compares to NoScript's Application Boundary Enforcer (ABE)? Clearly, they share the same motivation and design goals. Is one more powerful than the other? 15:39, 21 February 2012 128.112.139.195 (talk)

I added cross links. Widefox; talk 11:18, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

IMO, the text which currently says:

inline JavaScript (e.g. <script></script>, DOM event attributes like onclick, and anchor tags with an href value that starts with "javascript:") are blocked

should say:

inline JavaScript scripts (e.g. <script></script>, DOM event attributes like onclick, and anchor tags with an href value that starts with "javascript:") are blocked

or:

inline JavaScript (e.g. <script></script>, DOM event attributes like onclick, and anchor tags with an href value that starts with "javascript:") is blocked

--Arturotena (talk) 20:07, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done... but next time just make the change and mark it as a minor edit! idfubar (talk) 21:31, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The sentence "If the Content-Security-Policy-Report-Only header is present in the server response, a compliant client monitors and reports only (i.e. without enforcing the declarative whitelist policy. This is useful during development." seems redundant and was removed; please feel free to comment as appropriate... idfubar (talk) 21:34, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Content Security Policy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://ha.ckers.org/blog/20090701/mozillas-content-security-policy/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 22:17, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Content Security Policy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140817065612/https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/http-switchboard/mghdpehejfekicfjcdbfofhcmnjhgaag to https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/http-switchboard/mghdpehejfekicfjcdbfofhcmnjhgaag

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:31, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@henanshu 89.147.184.208 (talk) 19:49, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]