Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 05:00, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'll get to this shortly.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 05:00, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Clarify this: challenged the effort in court, but were denied an injunction. What does the court challenge have to do with an injunction?
• Capitalize State Representative
• Move the mention of the party affiliation of the Secretary of State to the first mention of his office
• "The" Democratic Legislative Campaign Committee
• Giron has claimed that the recall was due to voter suppression while it was clear that the voters did not agree. This is not what the source said. Giron did make that claim, but the Denver Post called her denial farcical.
• External links good; no DABs.
• Pics appropriately licensed.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:55, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Addressing:

• Clarify this: challenged the effort in court, but were denied an injunction. What does the court challenge have to do with an injunction?

The suit requested an injunction. I've added language to that effect to the lede.

• Capitalize State Representative

 Done

• Move the mention of the party affiliation of the Secretary of State to the first mention of his office

 Done

• "The" Democratic Legislative Campaign Committee

 Done

• Giron has claimed that the recall was due to voter suppression while it was clear that the voters did not agree. This is not what the source said. Giron did make that claim, but the Denver Post called her denial farcical.

Fixed, but used the word "nonsense", which was used in the editorial.

Let me know what else I need to work on. Oh, and thanks for reviewing this. GregJackP Boomer! 03:02, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No, you're good.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:49, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]