This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Sports and Games This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography This article is supported by the sports and games work group (assessed as Low-importance). Baseball: Cardinals Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Baseball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of baseball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BaseballWikipedia:WikiProject BaseballTemplate:WikiProject BaseballBaseball Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject St. Louis Cardinals (assessed as Mid-importance). United States: Arizona / 50,000 Challenge This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Arizona (assessed as Low-importance). This article was created or improved during this WikiProject's 50,000 Challenge, which started on November 1, 2016, and is ongoing. You can help!

To say that there is some sort of controversy over Duncan's tobacco habit is ridiculous. The article cites one source for this "controversy"--a forum where a couple of idiotic fans write poorly written posts complaining about it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.179.172.226 (talk) 11:26, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I sure can't figure out what ROY stands for and I don't think a section head should use what probably is an obscure abreviation. 69.29.207.109 (talk) 01:46, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

How come two fifths of the lead is low-relevance info about his family, that hardly appears in the article itself? Davidships (talk) 11:25, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]