This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Architecture Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. China Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Horticulture and Gardening Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horticulture and Gardening, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Horticulture and Gardening on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Horticulture and GardeningWikipedia:WikiProject Horticulture and GardeningTemplate:WikiProject Horticulture and GardeningHorticulture and gardening Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Philosophy: Aesthetics Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Associated task forces: /  Aesthetics Visual arts This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts Art+Feminism This article was created or improved at an Art+Feminism edit-a-thon in 2016.Art+FeminismWikipedia:Meetup/ArtAndFeminismTemplate:ArtAndFeminism articleArt+Feminism

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 03:51, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The picture of the palace of Nymphenburg is very dark and does not show well the chinoiserie. Besides the lay out of the article became very complex, but I think, it looks better now and it is easier to edit. Taksen (talk) 21:56, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Where or what is the definition provided by the American Heritage Dictionary? I like to read it. By the way, your lay out is boring! Chinoiserie is mend to be spectacular. I think you are missing the point. There is enough room on the server for bigger pictures, thy are stored somewhere else. Dont be too careful. Taksen (talk) 06:59, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Someone tried to drop a category, as it was not supported by the text, according to him. But the article tells us: "The popularity of chinoiserie peaked around the middle of the 18th century, when it was easily assimilated into rococo by the works of François Boucher." Then there are these pictures of Chinoiserie on buildings. How can we stop those people, who seem to have no particular knowledge on the subject? Taksen (talk) 17:59, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In the section "Tea" I have linked Queens Mary II and Anne. I intended to link Henrietta Howard and the Duchess of Queensbury, but I find that in each case there are two possibilities. Can someone identify them? J S Ayer (talk) 20:21, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'd guess Henrietta Howard, Countess of Suffolk (died 1715), but the whole passage seems confused - Queens Mary and Anne mostly collected Japanese export porcelain, & lived at a significantly earlier period than that referred to just before. You've linked the wrong Anne, & link Queen Anne not "Queen Anne". Johnbod (talk) 01:46, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good catch, now fixed. The article says they weren't precise about the Far East. Have linked one of the later ladies, but there is no article about the Countess of Ilchester. J S Ayer (talk) 05:26, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]