This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Internet Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Horror Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Internet culture Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Internet culture To-do: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : View all requested internet culture articles Expand : Pick an article from here or here Photo : Category:Internet culture articles needing images Stubs : All stubs are located here Other : Category:Internet self-classification codes (!?); Try to get YouTube to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject Internet culture}} See also Category:Internet culture articles needing attention Literature Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Novels: Short story Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Short story task force. Folklore Low‑importance This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Folklore, a WikiProject dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of the topics of folklore and folklore studies. If you would like to participate, you may edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project's page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to discussion.FolkloreWikipedia:WikiProject FolkloreTemplate:WikiProject FolkloreFolklore Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Since the TV show is a go and now passes notability guidelines, I figure that the story could merit its own article now. If not, it can always be redirected to the author's page with history until more September, I suppose. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:57, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm adding this wiki to the external links section. It has a fairly good overview of the creepypasta and its spinoffs. It's been a while since I visited the site, but I remember it to be a fairly well maintained wiki that didn't undergo a large amount of vandalism and had a fairly set amount of members. If this is incorrect, feel free to remove this. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:21, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• I'd originally added this to the wrong page, so I've moved the link and convo to the correct page. In any case, it looks like the wiki does have admins and a reasonably strict set of rules. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:25, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• I've readded this - I've found at least two sources that mention the wiki, so I figure that it'd be worth adding to the external links section. I did stress that it was an unofficial wiki, though. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:41, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure if this should be on the page. My reasoning is that none of the info on the wiki is true, it's all fan-fiction that's loosely based on the original story. Since there isn't a disclaimer about this on the wiki, It's entirely possible that someone might be unaware of this. 71.193.183.190 (talk) 12:40, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• It doesn't have to be true. The reason I re-added it is because it's mentioned in multiple sources as an example of the creepypasta's popularity, longevity, and fandom. I'd specifically mentioned in the external links that it was unofficial and a fan wiki - two things that mark it as something that wasn't created by Straub himself. The wiki might not have that on the page, but I do think that the average person should be able to tell that it isn't an official work of Straub's by the words "unofficial" and "fan". Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 03:08, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Basically, the main reason I am lobbying for it to be added is that it has been mentioned in multiple RS and as such, would add to the overall article. It's not a perfect wiki, but it does have admin oversight from what I can see and the way I've labeled it in the external links section would make it apparent to most visitors that it is unofficial and not "true", meaning that it wasn't created or approved by Straub and isn't part of his canon, which is limited to the original short story. What we have to look at is whether or not a reasonable visitor would be able to understand that it isn't canon, which I think is plausible since it's marked as unofficial and not canon by the phrase "unofficial fan wiki". Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:50, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not against it being on here because it's unofficial. I'm against it because everything on the wiki is fan-fiction presented as fact, and there's a risk that someone might visit the wiki and think it's true. It's also against Wikipedia's external link guidelines: "Any site that misleads the reader by use of factually inaccurate material or unverifiable research, except to a limited extent in articles about the viewpoints that the site is presenting". If you want to add a fan page to demonstrate the story's popularity, I'd recommend the Know Your Meme page. Rickraptor707 (talk) 01:14, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A bunch of logo kids are vandalizing the page. How are we gonna resolve this? Arfan Eka Diandra (talk) 05:08, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps it might be a good idea to get the page temporarily protected. LVDP01 (talk) 08:28, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An obscure Canadian children's TV series, The Pirates, is a possible inspiration for Candle Cove. Few episodes are still available, but they are very similar to the described series. There is a writeup for The Pirates at IMDB, and several pirated episodes can still be found on YouTube. Entageweorc (talk) 22:56, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]