This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Lepidoptera High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lepidoptera, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of butterflies and moths on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LepidopteraWikipedia:WikiProject LepidopteraTemplate:WikiProject LepidopteraLepidoptera High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Mllutz. Peer reviewers: Iginsberg, Pranita.kaginele.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 16:35, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am a student at Washington University in St. Louis and have worked in this page for a class assignment. Mllutz (talk) 21:01, 4 October 2017 (UTC)Mllutz[reply]

I added some information to the sections lacking complete information and checking reference validity. The article is mostly quite good just some sections could have more information. More sections could also be added. I think its close to being a Good Article! Iginsberg (talk) 20:56, 4 October 2017 (UTC) Awesome job! I changed a lot of minor things - making grammatical corrections, linking relevant articles, italicizing scientific names, minority changing the lead paragraph. I also added scientific names for other butterflies mentioned in the article. Engelde 4:42, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Just a note that on Wikipedia the standard way of writing section headings is in sentence case. That is, the first word is capitalized and subsequent words are not capitalized unless they include a proper noun. That's explained at MOS:HEADINGS in our Manual of Style.  SchreiberBike | ⌨  20:59, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! This is a well-written article! It is clear and concise, and stays in a neutral tone throughout the writing. I made a couple of grammatical changes to help add fluidity and clarity to the article. I also added various links throughout the article. I would suggest adding more to the Habitat and Geographic range sections to help the reader understand this information better. Also, if there is any information on the evolutionary significance of the promothea silkmoth pupating in trees instead of the ground, I would suggest adding that as well. Lastly, does this butterfly partake in Müllerian or Bayesian mimicry? I was not sure if the promethea silkmoth is poisonous itself, but if it is known, I would suggest clarifying this to the reader as well. Pranita.kaginele (talk) 00:07, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]