This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing: Software / CompSci Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Software. This article is supported by WikiProject Computer science (assessed as Low-importance). Things you can help WikiProject Computer science with: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Requested articles/Applied arts and sciences/Computer science, computing, and Internet Cleanup : Computer science articles needing attention Computer science articles needing expert attention Copyedit : Computing Expand : Computer science Infobox : Computer science articles without infoboxes Maintain : Timeline of computing 2020–present Photo : Find pictures for the biographies of computer scientists (see List of computer scientists) Computing articles needing images Stubs : Computer science stubs Unreferenced : WikiProject Computer science/Unreferenced BLPs Project-related : Tag all relevant articles in Category:Computer science and sub-categories with {{WikiProject Computer science}} Microsoft: .NET This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microsoft, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to Microsoft on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MicrosoftWikipedia:WikiProject MicrosoftTemplate:WikiProject MicrosoftMicrosoft ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject .NET (assessed as Mid-importance).

Why does this page have so much of an emphasis on COM? There is a large community of C# developers that have nothing to do with COM. COM might be useful for explaning motivation, but the reliance on COM to describe C# functionality seems unnecessarily confusing. For example, I've been using C# for 8 years and do not recall ever seeing any reference to COM in the C# spec (although there could be a few). - ATBS 14Aug09 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.112.25.123 (talk) 06:28, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Should the example `int x = 0;Increment(ref x);` have the ref in it? It seems to be the opposite of what's stated in the description. Db26 (talk) 01:54, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This section is identical to the same section in the C# Syntax page.
See its talk page for a discussion on recommended improvements that could also apply to the section here.

-- Forbin1 (talk) 19:49, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've not yet worked with C# 4.0, nor do I have ready access to a compiler for it, but why would "void Increment(ref int x, int dx = 1){} Increment(ref x, 2);" cause dx to take a value of 3? Wouldn't dx take the passed value of 2? Some explanation would help here. Macavity (talk) 16:42, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:C Sharp (programming language) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 21:35, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]