Talk:Bug (Dinosaur Jr. album)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Your Homework Assignment
What is really regrettable about this Wikipedia entry is that there are no contemporary reviews of the album, only retrospective reviews from the people who insert their reviews in EVERY Wikipedia music entry, in order to drive more viewers to their site (Allmusic). If you have the time to dig up a contemporary review, and grab some quotes? You'd be doing us all a great favor! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.130.216.156 (talk) 04:34, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
- I agree, but it's not just about "having time", it depends on actually having access to back issues of music magazines from 1988, which most people don't have. Richard3120 (talk) 16:43, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Bug (Dinosaur Jr. album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160304205526/http://www.stylusmagazine.com/reviews/dinosaur-jr/dinosaur-youre-living-all-over-me-bug.htm to http://www.stylusmagazine.com/reviews/dinosaur-jr/dinosaur-youre-living-all-over-me-bug.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:13, 10 November 2016 (UTC)