This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Politics This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Media This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MediaWikipedia:WikiProject MediaTemplate:WikiProject MediaMedia ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Media To-do List: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Cleanup : Media influence, Video game culture, Sound bite NPOV : Content (media and publishing) Verify : Multimedia, Alternative media, Alternative newspaper Other : Answer requests for comments Internet This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Websites: Computing This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Km4038b. Peer reviewers: Ll99ll.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 15:42, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

facts and numbers for additional understanding <http://www.bigthinkedge.com/?utm_campaign=Big%20Think%20Public&utm_source=Big%20Think%20Footer >

who is the founder? <http://bigthink.com/experts/victoriabrown>

who is the co founder? <http://bigthink.com/experts/peterhopkins>

what is big think? <http://bigthink.com/videos/where-did-big-think-come-from>

more about big think <http://bigthink.com/about>

whats so important about big think? <http://content.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,2087815_2087913_2087914,00.html> Km4038b (talk)

Is there a place to add that most if not all of the interviewees are authors promoting their book? Seems kind of important aspect of this site. 46.116.129.245 (talk) 02:37, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As someone who has seen quite a few Big Think videos and someone who often leans right on political issues, I think its not right to say that Big Think is a progressive outlet. Most of its videos explain scientific concepts in ways that do not promote a political agenda. Granted the ones that do involve a political issue tend to fall on the left or progressive side. However calling it progressive in the way this article does lumps it in with NowThis and Brut who are simply pushing left wing propaganda with every video they make. So I am going to remove the word "progressive" from the article.Liberty axe (talk) 05:08, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I edited the info concerning Big Think's 2012 statistics using the cited source.^[1] The number is 12,000+ and not 1,200. Darwin Naz (talk) 01:20, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This article goes out of its way to mention Koch Brother sponsorship, but then fails to mention any other sponsors, making it appear that this organization is completely and solely funded and even controlled by the Koch Brothers. The writing is vague, and the research almost non-existent. Maybe the Koch Brothers are just one of thousands of benefactors, and maybe they donate a token amount. We simply don't know. Until we have better information I am removing it from the lead section as the notability and importance is not established. -- GreenC 18:35, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On closer examination, the cited source doesn't even say Big Think is sponsored by the Koch Brothers. It's in the "People" section of the website. This could be because someone from the Koch Foundation was one of the guest speakers at some point. Removed entire: Special:Diff/1179529017/1192676205 -- GreenC 18:39, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]