This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Bible This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bible, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Bible on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BibleWikipedia:WikiProject BibleTemplate:WikiProject BibleBible ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Christianity This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Translation studies This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Translation Studies, a collaborative effort to expand, improve and standardise the content and structure of articles related to Translation Studies. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of objectives.Translation studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Translation studiesTemplate:WikiProject Translation studiesTranslation studies ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Linguistics This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

We need an expert or SOMEONE to clean this article up significantly. The descriptions are apparently copied wholesale from the sites of the translations, looking more like an advertisement than part of a Wikipedea article. Lord Seth (talk) 05:27, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I just added two versions in the "comparison" . I noticed there weren't any catholic versions, so I added versicles of two catholic versions.
--Juancho991 (talk) 01:34, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure it if is within the scope of the article but what translations use the Voseo pronoun and conjugation?--Kencaesi (talk) 19:38, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Response: To my knowledge no version uses the voseo (informal 2nd person used in Rio de la Plata, Chile, and some parts of Central America). However, many versions use the vosotros (informal second person plural used in Spain). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:A000:1323:405D:B978:11D0:FD54:BCD7 (talk) 14:09, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bible translations into Spanish. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150724114610/https://www.churchpublishing.org/general_convention/pdf_const_2003/Title_II_Worship.pdf to http://www.churchpublishing.org/general_convention/pdf_const_2003/Title_II_Worship.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:29, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]