This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women
Beate Eriksen has been linked from multiple high-traffic websites.
All prior and subsequent edits to the article are noted in its revision history.
This article has now been linked from the main page for nearly 36 hours and I'm planning to remove it shortly. I just thought I'd check if there are any comments from editors here about whether this is long enough. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 14:10, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No idea of even how to find her Erdos number, but excuse me for my laziness. The Oracle of Bacon gives a Bacon number of 3:
Beate Eriksen was in Plastposen (1986) with
Sverre Anker Ousdal was in The Island at the Top of the World (1974) with
Donald Sinden was in Balto (1995) with
Kevin Bacon
so I guess the question is whether OoB is a reliable source and whether it's relevant? Smallbones (talk)
Not really relevant. Since it's running a script on a database, it's basically original research – in other words, it's demonstrably true that her Bacon number is 3, but no human being outside of Wikipedia has written about it. Noisalt (talk) 12:50, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Bacon numbers are fun but meaningless, because most folks in show business have very low ones, it's unencyclopedic noise. My own Bacon number is no higher than 3 (a few ways), may even be 2 but he's worked with so many folks and I've never spent more than a few minutes looking into it, smirking. Gwen Gale (talk) 12:58, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
OK, some people (obviously no fun at all) objected so I won't put it in. But did you know that she almost certainly has the highest Wikipedia Bacon ratio (Wikipedia article number divided by Bacon number) and that it is exactly 1,000,000? As always, Smallbones (talk) 14:15, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]