This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Australia: Military history Low‑importance Battle of Dumpu is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force (assessed as Low-importance). Need help improving this article? Ask a LibrarianWhat's this? at the National Library of Australia. The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance. Japan Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 22:26, December 23, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Japan to do list: Peer review: None A-class review: None Featured content candidates –  Articles: None Pictures: None Lists: None Good article nominations: Vinland Saga (TV series), Godzilla Minus One Add requested images to articles that need them. Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions. Improve and expand Japan-related stubs. Create some requested articles. Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English. Assess unassessed articles Military history: Asian / South Pacific / Japanese / North America / Southeast Asia / United States / World War II This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history Associated task forces: /  Asian military history task force Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force Japanese military history task force North American military history task force Southeast Asian military history task force United States military history task force World War II task force Melanesia: Papua New Guinea Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Melanesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Melanesia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MelanesiaWikipedia:WikiProject MelanesiaTemplate:WikiProject MelanesiaMelanesia Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Papua New Guinea (assessed as Low-importance). United States: Military history Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Military history - U.S. military history task force.

Nice article. The phrase "as a logistical" needs something more to be grammatical, within full sentence "An airstrip was developed at Dumpu, which would assume great importance as a logistical in the subsequent fighting in the Finisterres." I tried using revision history search to isolate the diff, but it seems I don't know how to use it. Hope this helps. --doncram 02:46, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I have fixed the wording. Hawkeye7 (talk) 05:22, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Battle of Dumpu/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Zawed (talk · contribs) 03:30, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I will take a look at this one. Zawed (talk) 03:30, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Perhaps add a couple of sentences following "the 7th Division advanced from Kaiapit to Dumpu in the Ramu Valley." to describe the nature of the advance and opposition.

  Y Added. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:35, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• The link on Lae isn't on its first usage.

  Y Linked. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:35, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Between the Ramu Valley...: the link on Ramu Valley is actually to the river, which is mentioned earlier.

  Y Unlinked. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:35, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Some of the dates in the Military Situation section recite the year (1943) when that has already been established and it is clear from the context that it hasn't progressed to 1944.

  Y Removed. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:35, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• ...belonging to 78th Infantry Regiment, along with one company of the 80th Infantry Regiment.: perhaps clarify that these regiments are part of the 20th Division. That introduces the division and places it in better context when it is mentioned in the next paragraph.

  Y Changed as suggested. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:35, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• the heavily equipped diggers: just wondering whether diggers is a little colloquial here?

  Y I don't think so. Linked. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:35, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• and ANGAU hired local labour: maybe provide a little context for what ANGAU is here?

  Y Added a footnote about ANGAU. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:35, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• moved to Kaigulan II: what is moved to Kaigulan II? Sounds like a military base?

  Y Not really. Changed "II" to "2" and added an explanatory footnote. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:35, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Private W. H. G. remained to protect Honner: missing a surname for the private? It may not be important but the private isn't mentioned again and the reader gets the impression later that Honner had been abandoned.

  Y Private W. H. G. Bennett QX27023. Not sure how his name got deleted. Added a bit more. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:35, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Dupe links: Lae, Papuan Infantry Battalion

  Y Unlinked. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:35, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Image tags OK.

This looks to be in good order with only minor issues. Cheers, Zawed (talk) 10:13, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

All points addressed. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:35, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hawkeye, this looks all good. I believe that the article meets the necessary criteria so am passing as GA. Cheers, Zawed (talk) 09:29, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]