This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Basque This article is within the scope of WikiProject Basque, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Basque Country, Basque people, Basque language, history and culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BasqueWikipedia:WikiProject BasqueTemplate:WikiProject BasqueBasque ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. Mythology This article is supported by WikiProject Mythology. This project provides a central approach to Mythology-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the WikiProject page for more details.MythologyWikipedia:WikiProject MythologyTemplate:WikiProject MythologyMythology ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Spain This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

"Such speculation does not fit the Neanderthals completely, since several reconstructed Neanderthal skeletons are several inches taller than 5 feet, which is taller than the average humans from that era. Neanderthal Height Neanderthal Height Neanderthal Height"

earlier it was stated they were 2 to 3 meters tall, this is contradicting itself KungFurules (talk) 01:40, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No it's not, the Basajauns "were" 2-3 meters tall, not the Neandertals. Esn (talk) 21:39, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Editor Sandstein reverted my edit with the edit summary not an improvement. I dispute that.

I came to this page because it was (and now is again) a member of Category:CS1 maint: Missing pipe. It is a member of that category because one of the parameters in a {{cite book}} template is missing a pipe character: series=Obras completas should be |series=Obras completas.

When I fixed that, I also fixed the improper use of description list markup (the semicolon introduces a term that is 'described' by the text following a colon on the same or next line – see MOS:DLIST). Because the markup immediately following the term markup is for unordered lists (the asterisk markup) the semicolon markup is inappropriate so I replaced it with standard bold markup. H:DL has this:

Do not use a semicolon (;) simply to bold a line without defining a value using a colon (:). This usage renders invalid HTML5 and creates issues with screen readers.

How is any of this not an improvement?

—Trappist the monk (talk) 15:30, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]