This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Mythology This article is supported by WikiProject Mythology. This project provides a central approach to Mythology-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the WikiProject page for more details.MythologyWikipedia:WikiProject MythologyTemplate:WikiProject MythologyMythology ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Jewish history This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jewish history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jewish history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Jewish historyWikipedia:WikiProject Jewish historyTemplate:WikiProject Jewish historyJewish history-related ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Occult Start‑class Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occult, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to the occult on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OccultWikipedia:WikiProject OccultTemplate:WikiProject OccultOccult Start This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Phoenicia High‑importance This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Phoenicia, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Phoenicia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.PhoeniciaWikipedia:WikiProject PhoeniciaTemplate:WikiProject PhoeniciaPhoenicia High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Oh, sure, why not? Ian.thomson (talk) 15:28, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done. N3philim (talk) 01:55, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

? — LlywelynII 11:36, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Now documented the {{copied}} template above. Wbm1058 (talk) 20:24, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! — LlywelynII 23:20, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I am part of an organization called "Berith Christian Fellowship". I understand "Berith" is the Hebrew word for blood covenant, or to cut where blood flows. Could you add an article that has this additional reference to Berith. Thanks. 71.146.26.38 (talk) 16:27, 1 June 2011 (UTC)Corwin J. Stone, Oakland, CA.[reply]

New stuff goes at the bottom. Wikipedia does not promote any organization, and will only discuss organizations that meet the notability guidelines (which can be read here). Ian.thomson (talk) 16:49, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't this the same deity as Berith (god)? The exact same Biblical verses are used. If so, I'd suggest merging the pages. --Eddyspeeder (talk) 08:54, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Merge here. "Berith" isn't the name of the god: it's an epithet describing "Baal" or "El". — LlywelynII 11:36, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Done – Wbm1058 (talk) 22:37, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, LlywelynII. I'm afraid I don't really understand your rationale from your edit summary. I merged the articles, as proposed above.

See Berith (disambiguation). What do you think a reader searching "Berith" is most likely looking for? Are you saying that there is no clear WP:primary topic for that title, and they are at least nearly just as likely to be looking for Berith Melin? This seems like a WP:TWODAB situation, that could almost be handled with a hatnote. Surely the historic house Berith Park doesn't merit consideration, as a partial title match. Wbm1058 (talk) 23:06, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My edit summary was perfectly clear. Berith is "covenant" and Hebrew placenames that include it; it is not the same topic (WP:SCOPE) as "Lord of the Covenant" at all. This is not the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC of that name and it should point at the disambiguation page. Google searches for "Berith -Wikipedia" will return some results for this demon (It's part of his name) but just as many for discussion of the Hebrew word and the Biblical conception of covenant. It's not the primarytopic by any stretch. If there's a hatnote solution, it belongs on Covenant (biblical), not here.

Similarly, the dab page was perfectly clear, and your WP:POVPUSHing by editing Baal Berith as though it were the primarytopic and removal of the actual primary meaning of the word are both... well, inappropriate. Kindly stop doing things like that.

To clarify, yes, you did a good thing merging the content of the original article. Thanks! But it was always the wrong name and its namespace shouldn't point primarily to the god/demon at all. — LlywelynII 23:16, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but the dab page wasn't all that clear to me, until your recent edit that added Berith mila, which does make it clear that there are other uses and topics for "Berith". I'm agnostic about this; I don't have any POV about this topic, which frankly, I know little more about than what I'm reading on Wikipedia. I just want to tie the pieces together, so they connect in a logical way. Thanks for helping to do that. Wbm1058 (talk) 23:28, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

So berith, wikt:brit and wikt:bris are all alternate transliterations of the Hebrew word for covenant? Wbm1058 (talk) 23:42, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

LlywelynII, I merged the history and moved the dab. I think this is now configured about the way you wanted it. Let me know if there are still any problems around this, that need admin help to fix. Thanks, Wbm1058 (talk) 00:37, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]