This article is within the scope of WikiProject Objectivism, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.ObjectivismWikipedia:WikiProject ObjectivismTemplate:WikiProject ObjectivismObjectivism
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media franchises, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to media franchises on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Media franchisesWikipedia:WikiProject Media franchisesTemplate:WikiProject Media franchisesmedia franchise
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction
If these films had been released in the late 1950's, they very likely would have been successful, possibly very successful. But releasing them in 2011, 2012, and 2014 was an absurd artistic/financial decision. The plot and themes of the book, possibly relevant in the 1950's and 60's, are absurd and irrelevant today. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.30.127.196 (talk) 06:32, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This is not a forum to discuss the film from an artistic criticism perspective. This is a forum to discuss the associated Wikipedia article. Michipedian (talk) 02:31, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Diese Website benutzt Cookies. Wenn du die Website weiter nutzt, gehe Ich von Deinem Einverständnis aus.OKNeinDatenschutzerklärung