This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Internet culture Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article. WikiProject Internet culture To-do: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : View all requested internet culture articles Expand : Pick an article from here or here Photo : Category:Internet culture articles needing images Stubs : All stubs are located here Other : Category:Internet self-classification codes (!?); Try to get YouTube to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject Internet culture}} See also Category:Internet culture articles needing attention Websites: Computing Low‑importance This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Computing. Blogging (inactive) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Blogging, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.BloggingWikipedia:WikiProject BloggingTemplate:WikiProject BloggingBlogging Literature Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I reverted the deletions made in early May by an unregistered user. Sir, I'd be happy to keep the changes you made, but normal protocol on Wikipedia is to use the talkpage to explain any major deletions (or other edits) you make. Most of the edits you made were simple deletions of content that, as far as I know, was accurate (e.g. "Carol Gould suggested the name 'Arts & Letters Daily'). In future just make a note on this talkpage explaining why you are deleting sections of the page, and I'll be unlikely to revert your changes. Babajobu 19:12, 9 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The quotes on this page about ALD are very positive. Though I'm personally a fan of the site I'm aware there are many negative ones out there. So if no one disagrees in the next week or two I'll find a few and put them on for a bit of balance. Unless someone beats me to it. Kansaikiwi 02:21, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a conservative or liberal bias on this page? I noticed a lot of conservative writers. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.111.95.168 (talk) 23:01, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I just completed a significant update to the article, introducing the use of references for the first time. Please don't add anything substantive without citing sources, keeping in mind Wikipedia's policies of no original research and a neutral point of view, among others. Thanks. 67.100.125.8 (talk) 23:21, 23 June 2009 (UTC).[reply]

An image used in this article, File:Arts letters daily.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests February 2012 What should I do? Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Arts letters daily.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 00:00, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Arts & Letters Daily. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

• Attempted to fix sourcing for http://chronicle.com/free/2002/10/2002102510n.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:23, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Arts & Letters Daily. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080307112136/http://archive.salon.com/tech/view/2000/11/03/dutton/index.html to http://archive.salon.com/tech/view/2000/11/03/dutton/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:05, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]