This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Arctic Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arctic, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Arctic on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArcticWikipedia:WikiProject ArcticTemplate:WikiProject ArcticArctic Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. International relations Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. Politics Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Which article lists the dedicated military forces in the region?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/7967973.stm

http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2009/03/russias-new/

etc. Hcobb (talk) 10:03, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The "Winter city" section should be removed from the article since it is not germane to the Arctic subject of the overall article.Moryak (talk) 21:24, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Arctic cooperation and politics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110723102512/http://www.pnwer.org:80/WorkingGroups/ArcticCaucus.aspx to http://pnwer.org/WorkingGroups/ArcticCaucus.aspx
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101231030352/http://alaskadispatch.com/dispatches/arctic/6502-arctic-sovereignty-non-negotiable-canadas-pm to http://alaskadispatch.com/dispatches/arctic/6502-arctic-sovereignty-non-negotiable-canadas-pm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110708140813/http://chauprade.com/ocean-arctique/russia-on-track-for-new-arctic-bid-in-2013-05-10-10 to http://chauprade.com/ocean-arctique/russia-on-track-for-new-arctic-bid-in-2013-05-10-10
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110224190430/http://www.arcticathabaskancouncil.com:80/aboutus to http://www.arcticathabaskancouncil.com/aboutus
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.state.gov/g/oes/ocns/opa/index.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091219123121/http://www.svs.is:80/AHDR/ to http://www.svs.is/AHDR/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100912104321/http://eyeonthearctic.rcinet.ca:80/index.php to http://eyeonthearctic.rcinet.ca/index.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:17, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Arctic cooperation and politics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://pnwer.org/WorkingGroups/ArcticCaucus.aspx
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1088937X.2014.965769
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110224190430/http://www.arcticathabaskancouncil.com/aboutus to http://www.arcticathabaskancouncil.com/aboutus
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.svs.is/AHDR/
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://eyeonthearctic.rcinet.ca/index.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:47, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Titled is the former short description which I wrote and which was unsurprisingly changed to ❝Between the eight Arctic nations❞. There appears to be some shame within Wikipedians in utilizing the emojis, where applicable. For instance, flag elements are already used in texts. However, rich text isn't available in short descriptions which ought to be concise. Thus, logically flag emojis should be allowed. And they are - no rules are prohibiting them. I hope we Wikipedians will rethink emojis at large. ToniTurunen (talk) 13:05, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]