Langbahn Team – Weltmeisterschaft

Talk:Archer (2009 TV series)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Adamstom.97 (talk · contribs) 22:17, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Looks like this has been waiting for review for long enough. I intend to get some thoughts up here pretty soon. - adamstom97 (talk) 22:17, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Here are some things that I think should be addressed before this article is promoted to GA:

  • Rather than saying "Season" so much in the infobox, I would suggest just using "S#", with # being the respective season number(s). If you are concerned that some readers will not understand this, perhaps Template:Abbr will be helpful.
  • For genre, I think you should only list the ones that apply to all or most seasons. Styles used for a specific season's story are better discussed in prose.
  • Co-executive producers are not executive producers, and should not be listed as such.
  • I believe Willis was a coproducer as one point promoted as an executive producer in the show’s recent history. Nevertheless, he is listed as an executive producer now. Removed. DAP 💅 13:59, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • The reference in the lead should be removed. It is inappropriate to link to other wikis like that, and is unnecessary since the content is in the article body.
  • I don't think the actors should be noted in the character/setting section, as it duplicates their introduction to readers in the casting section, and we generally recommend against listing actors in sections for plot summaries at MOS:TV.
  • The development section should note when the show was officially picked up by FX, before you mention that it was moved to FXX.
  • The soundtrack section is a bit bare, and I find it slightly confusing. Could you find some more info on this, and fill it out a bit more to make it clear where music came from chronologically?
  • Unfortunately, this is all the available information about the show’s score. I’d prefer it not be merged with the music section as they don’t really tie in together, but I could rework to create a new subsection. Ultimately that’s your call. DAP 💅 13:59, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
In that case, can you re-write what content you do have to be clearer? It is very confusing as is in terms of what music came from where and when. Chronological order of information would be preferred. - adamstom97 (talk) 01:15, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Have a go at those, and let me know when you are done / if you have any questions. - adamstom97 (talk) 02:08, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Adamstom.97: Thanks for the review! I believe I have addressed everything. DAP 💅 02:19, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, that is much better. Congratulations DAP, this review has passed . - adamstom97 (talk) 02:37, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]