Langbahn Team – Weltmeisterschaft

Talk:Arab Spring

Infographics

Where does the infographic originate? I have seen it reproduced on several websites but would like to know its origin for citation purposes. 81.158.47.79 (talk) 16:06, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

From what I see they were made for Wikipedia, however, you can see the original data by clicking on the graphic then clicking on the more details button at the bottom right, below the image, then, once the more detailed information pops up scroll down and there should be the links to the sources. V. L. Mastikosa (talk) 03:59, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Counter-revolution and civil wars - edits

I noticed errors and confusing writing in this section and I edited to address this and improve the clarity of the content. -- e.g., one cited source was named but not identified as an expert, or the context of his statements (an op-ed). Also, a second reference instance misspelled his name ('Kapalan', instead of Kabalan). Dano67 (talk) 10:16, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In his thesis, Webeaucracy: The Collaborative Revolution

This link is dead. I am not sure how to mark it. Syakovlev13 (talk) 19:47, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

etymology

I thought it was important to reflect the debated aspect of the term “Arab Spring” and its usage, reflecting the fact that it is a debated terminology amongst some scholars and observers. I edited the etymology section by merging the below to the existing section:  

The denomination “Arab Spring” is contested by some scholars and observers claiming that the term is problematic for several reasons. First, it was coined by Western commentators, not those involved in the events. Protestors instead described their own political actions as "uprising" (intifada), Arab "awakening" (sahwa) or Arab renaissance (nahda), using expressions like al-marar al-Arabi (the Arab bitterness), karama (dignity) and thawra (revolution). 1 4 Some authors argue that western governments, scholars and media used the term to minimise people’s revolutionary aims and discourse. 2 3 4 The term “Spring” illustrates this problematic as it follows the western example of the Revolutions of 1848 referred to as “Spring of Nations”, which signifies an expectation that the events would replicate the example of democratic revolutions set by the West. 1 4 The term “Arab” is problematic as well as it homogenises the region’s cultural specificities and oversimplifies the nature of its diverse histories and cultures.1 Curiouschanter (talk) 00:02, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can Assad really be counted?

Among the tyrants deposed by the Arab Spring, Bashar al-Assad of Syria is currently listed in this article as having been deposed in 2024. But can the ousting of a tyrant a full 13 years after the Arab Spring really be counted as a consequence of those uprisings?

I submit that Assad halted the Arab Spring: that is to say, he refused to concede (unlike the other tyrants who were toppled by the movement) and, through extreme genocidal means, held onto power, until long after the Arab Spring had ended. Does it really make sense to count his ouster as a result of an uprising 13 years in the past? Certainly he was initially targeted by that revolution, but he wasn't toppled by it: he survived it. His eventual removal from power happened long after the Arab Spring was history. Thanks and happy editing, Chillowack (talk) 05:59, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]