This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Christianity Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Classical Greece and Rome Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. History High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Religion High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. European history High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject European history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of Europe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European historyWikipedia:WikiProject European historyTemplate:WikiProject European historyEuropean history High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Former countries This article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please join the project.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesformer country Rome High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rome, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the city of Rome and ancient Roman history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RomeWikipedia:WikiProject RomeTemplate:WikiProject RomeRome High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Greece: Byzantine High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greek history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Byzantine world task force. Middle Ages High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Politics High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is not about the late Byzantine Empire, but rather about the late Roman Empire or the Early Byzantine Empire. It should be merged with the Decline of Greco-Roman polytheism — Preceding unsigned comment added by Astrohoundy (talk • contribs) 14:55, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• I moved the article to "early". Marcocapelle (talk) 08:22, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It turns out that the current caption for File:Symmachi-Nicomachi_diptych_2.JPG is incorrect. It reads "Ivory diptych of a priestess of Ceres, still in fully classical style, ca 400, which was defaced and thrown in a well at Montier-en-Der.^[1]." The cited source doesn't corroborate this, nor does the actual article on this piece. The article makes it clear that it was intact, and only later "heavily damaged by fire" during the French Revolution. It was found in a well, but only after remaining fully intact and incorporated into a Christian reliquary. There is no mention whatsoever that it was "defaced," which is especially relevant given that the other panel of diptych is less damaged, and the face of its figure has entirely survived. There's more corroboration on this here. Note that this is also the case at Persecution of pagans in the late Roman Empire, where the same image appears with the same caption (mistakenly restored by me after an anonymous edit sparked my investigation). In light of this, I will be removing both images from both articles. Global Cerebral Ischemia (talk) 13:56, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Just skimming the two articles, it looks as though this one contains a fair amount of properly-sourced material that isn't duplicated in the article it's said to be a duplicate of, and some of it certainly concerns eastern emperors, alone or acting in concert with western emperors. Unless closer scrutiny shows that the appearance of unique material is illusory, the better way to address this would be to merge the usable content from here into the other article, not to delete this one entirely. In the alternative, this one could be trimmed down by removing fully duplicative material, and the remainder either expanded with available knowledge that doesn't belong in the Roman one, or left as a stub for future expansion, if that seems like a reasonable possibility. Note that in some cases there's bound to be some overlap, if there is enough of a topic here to support an article; to the extent that the two halves of the empire acted in concert, or the events of one half influenced the other, that would be relevant here, even if it's also mentioned in the other article, as long as this one contains notable material that isn't duplicated there. Whether to merge the two articles, or trim this one down, is a question that needs to be explored further. But simply deleting this one without attempting either option doesn't sound like the right solution. P Aculeius (talk) 14:10, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. Hopefully someone actually *does* those things. I'll see what I can do when I get a chance; hopefully others will help. Global Cerebral Ischemia (talk) 18:57, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion about possibly deleting this article is taking place at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome#"Anti-paganism policy"/persecution articles. Avilich (talk) 03:48, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]