This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

R&B and Soul Music Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of R&B and Soul Music articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.R&B and Soul MusicWikipedia:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicTemplate:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicR&B and Soul Music Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Songs This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong

I've seen that this song has made the top 10, so why not make it into an article? - Speedfish 16:57, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

@Tim96144:, what reason is there for using Template:col-2 and aligning the two charts tables alongside each other? Is it merely cosmetic, or is there some guideline we can refer to in regards to the technical aspect of this? WP:ADTABLE advises that "readers often prefer a vertical listing of data" (as opposed to the horizontal layout that results from your column divider), while MOS:ALBUM (at least for personnel items) recommends the template for listings of 20+; the two tables combined add up to 12 rows of text at the most. isento (talk) 01:40, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Like this said, why not use Template:Col-2?? I checked Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums/Album article style advice and Wikipedia:Advanced table formatting, They don't ask can't use Template col-start, col-2 and col-end forcibly, it just SUGGEST using. You don't have right to request other editors CAN'T use columns, thank you. Tim96144 (talk) 05:55, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You still haven't addressed the text I highlighted in red for you. Nor have you pointed to anything explaining why these tables should be divided up this way. I have the right to challenge edits, especially when they seem like an indiscriminate stylistic change rather than anything beneficial to readers. isento (talk) 06:20, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]