This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Canada: Nunavut / Geography Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian Territories. This article is supported by WikiProject Geography of Canada. Lakes Low‑importance Angikuni Lake is within the scope of WikiProject Lakes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of lake-related articles on Wikipedia, using the tools on the project page. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LakesWikipedia:WikiProject LakesTemplate:WikiProject LakesLakes Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Folklore Low‑importance This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Folklore, a WikiProject dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of the topics of folklore and folklore studies. If you would like to participate, you may edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project's page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to discussion.FolkloreWikipedia:WikiProject FolkloreTemplate:WikiProject FolkloreFolklore Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The article states "The RCMP has since dismissed the case as an urban legend, claiming that the story originated in Frank Edwards' book," which book was published in 1959. The article also states "the earliest version of the story is found in the November 27, 1930, Danville Bee, written by journalist Emmett E Kelleher." Was it 1930 or 1959?--Richardson mcphillips (talk) 02:26, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

1930. The RCMP, as you can see, claim otherwise.--Auric talk 12:39, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I see that. My problem is that the article states "is found in the 1930 Danville Bee." The article doesn't state "Frank Edwards claimed to have seen a copy of the 1930 Danville Bee, which cannot be found."--Richardson mcphillips (talk) 00:04, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]