Langbahn Team – Weltmeisterschaft

Talk:Andretti Global

Team Green vs. Andretti Green Racing

I think this should be split into 2 articles: Team Green and Andretti Green Racing. A lot changed when Andretti purchased the majority interest in Team Green. Royalbroil 01:29, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. The article is very focused on the team as it has existed since the Andretti purchase and the IRL move. The ALMS section also requires updating and expansion, I'll work on that part soon. Lmj81 (talk) 19:50, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Team Green vs. Andretti Green Racing vs. Andretti Autosport

I don't know what the policies are, but should we as a Wikipedia community refer to all Team Green and Andretti Green Racing instances as Andretti Autosport? Should we create three separate articles on each era of the team? I don't know what anyone else thinks, but I believe referring to the Team Green years in articles as Andretti Autosport seems a bit off for me. Manningmbd 16:02, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think the article is named correctly (after the current usage). The name used in a particular article should reflect the name used at the time in the article. For example, an article about a driver from the Team Green era should use the pipe trick [[Andretti Autosport|Team Green]] to refer to the team. Drivers/owners who transitioned between the eras should have the team name change discussed in the text of the article. This way keeps everything clean for the reader. Royalbroil 13:30, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Andretti Autosport. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:51, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Andretti Autosport. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:42, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Andretti Autosport. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:11, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed Split

I propose splitting the Formula 1 bid into its own article and expanding it. I'm happy to go about doing that work myself later today, but beforehand I was wondering if this would have general approval? If not I will create it as a draft and then propose it JM12624 11:02, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think it needs to be split at this time, but an expansion would nonetheless be a good thing. Can always discuss splitting later if people feel it's too long. ― "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk)  12:40, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I agree it needs more info to justify a split, but it feels very tangential to the main article and I think the current section is both well sourced but also lacking in detail. If I can present a version that is more heavy I'll come back to this. Just feels a lot like FISA–FOCA war for example if we can get it expanded upon enough to justify the split. Although Fédération Internationale du Sport Automobile and Formula One Constructors' Association are stubs.
If you'd like I'll tag you when I have developed it out more for your opinion. JM12624 12:57, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If what you're writing is primarily about the drama between Andretti and FOM, then I don't think you need consensus for a split here at all, and can just make a new article with a title such as "Andretti Global attempts to enter Formula 1" or something similar, since this would certainly pass GNG as a standalone article. ― "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk)  14:28, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Quelle: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Andretti_Global