This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Television Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Animation: American / Television Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the American animation work group (assessed as Mid-importance). This article is supported by the Animated television work group (assessed as Mid-importance). Comedy Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. United States: Animation / Television Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Animation - American animation work group (assessed as Mid-importance). This article is supported by American television task force (assessed as Low-importance). Virginia Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Virginia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Virginia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirginiaWikipedia:WikiProject VirginiaTemplate:WikiProject VirginiaVirginia Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. 20th Century Studios Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject 20th Century Studios, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 20th Century Studios and its affiliated companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.20th Century StudiosWikipedia:WikiProject 20th Century StudiosTemplate:WikiProject 20th Century Studios20th Century Studios Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present.

If you people want to keep putting in the wrong distribution company on FOX produced show, fine so be it, I don't care anymore, even though Disney owns FOX and its subsidiaries this and other FOX shows are STILL distributed by 20th Television Distribution, NOT Disney. Disney may have combined the operations of 20th Television and Disney Domestic Distribution but 20th Television still exists as a separate entity (subsidiary of Disney) to distribute FOX and FOX syndicated show. I put my hands up and declare that I give up! In the words of Eric Cartman from South Park, Screw you guys I'm going home. YborCityJohn (talk) 02:17, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As the info was sourced only to IMDb, I have removed it in accordance with WP:RS/IMDb. If and when a better source is provided, we can reevaluate it. DonIago (talk) 03:22, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you User:Doniago. I have faith in the Wikipediaverse again. :0). YborCityJohn (talk) 01:54, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I accept PayPal and Venmo. :p #kidding DonIago (talk) 03:52, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey guys! I was wondering if you guys think we should include info about past renewals. Is it still as relevant considering seasons 18 and 19 have already aired? — MilesShriv (talk) 14:07, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed these from the lead per WP:NOTNEWS and WP:RECENTISM. The show was presumably renewed over and over on Fox, yet that is not in the lead, and it would be turgid to read if every one was. I guess we can have the most recent season as to show that the show is still active, but it's odd to have just the last four. Unknown Temptation (talk) 22:07, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There are a few issues found while reading the article. It is a B-class article and the criteria states:

• #1)- The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations. It has reliable sources, and any important or controversial material which is likely to be challenged is cited.
• #2)- The article is reasonably well-written.

The article is listed in the categories:

• Articles containing potentially dated statements from November 2013
• Wikipedia articles that are excessively detailed from December 2020
• Wikipedia articles with style issues from December 2020
• Articles needing additional references from July 2022

The Adult Swim "External link" seems to have some plot summaries. These don't seem to add anything unique or adding to "further research" that cannot be found in reliable sources.

Added together these could trigger a reassessment and possible downgrading. -- Otr500 (talk) 15:15, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The second paragraph of the "Editing, completion, and deadlines" has an unsourced inline quote which is unacceptable and needs correcting.

• See: The second paragraph of the lead of Wikipedia:Verifiability: [[tq|All material in Wikipedia mainspace, including everything in articles, lists, and captions, must be verifiable. Additionally, four types of information must be accompanied by an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports the material: direct quotations}}MOS:QUOTE, and WP:QUOTE. -- Otr500 (talk) 15:42, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  So, give it a CN tag, and if nobody provides a source for the quote, remove it? Or, if you want to be bolder, just remove it? This doesn't seem like something that needs a thread here? DonIago (talk) 16:41, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]