Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Bobamnertiopsis (talk · contribs) 03:31, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Good job! This is a very good article, certainly one worthy of GA status. My one suggestion: provide some context for the tin can Allow Me seems to be holding in the second image. Otherwise, you get a pass! Congrats! BobAmnertiopsis∴_ChatMe! 03:31, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reviewing the article. The image name contains "Tin Squibbles", but I am not sure what this refers to, hence why I omitted details from the caption. --Another Believer _(Talk) 23:21, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]