This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Internet culture Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Internet culture To-do: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : View all requested internet culture articles Expand : Pick an article from here or here Photo : Category:Internet culture articles needing images Stubs : All stubs are located here Other : Category:Internet self-classification codes (!?); Try to get YouTube to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject Internet culture}} See also Category:Internet culture articles needing attention Writing systems Low‑importance This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Writing systems, a WikiProject interested in improving the encyclopaedic coverage and content of articles relating to writing systems on Wikipedia. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project’s talk page.Writing systemsWikipedia:WikiProject Writing systemsTemplate:WikiProject Writing systemsWriting system Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Linguistics Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. TikTok This article is within the scope of WikiProject TikTok, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of TikTok on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TikTokWikipedia:WikiProject TikTokTemplate:WikiProject TikTokTikTok

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: https://apnews.com/article/unalive-suicide-tiktok-language-death-e605d4da81c02335a3b60d27c40562bc https://www.forbes.com/sites/anthonytellez/2023/01/31/mascara-unalive-corn-what-common-social-media-algospeak-words-actually-mean/ https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/20563051231194586

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: There's a case for a merge to Leet#Algospeak, given that this page is short, but perhaps there is space to expand the topic here. The topic is worth covering somewhere!

Klbrain (talk) 07:34, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Quintopia who said "... its lexicon is so distinct from leet, and the demographic creating it is so disconnected from the demographic that created leet. Given how alive and dynamic algospeak is, it no longer makes sense to have the two share a page". But yeah, this page is rather short. I think the topic will inspire a more expansive article in time Wesadius (talk) 11:50, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I concur. Kronenn (talk) 01:04, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I agree as creator. I have listed sources in the lead paragraph that could be incorporated. I might get into expanding this article once I have enough time on my hands, but help from outside is always welcome. Ca ^{talk to me!} 10:00, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It might read similar, but it is not a duplicate, since there is no connective sentence that actually states "algospeak can be used to avoid such and such". This connective sentence is not original research as it is obviously supported by the citation, but it's easy to miss that obvious things might need to be said.  AltoStev (talk) 23:07, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]