This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Sociology Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Economics Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The tag at the head of the article indicates that this article is too narrowly focused, and I agree. I went ahead and added a section about stratification and achieved status on an international level, and I think that will partly resolve the issue. I think the article also needs a section on current research, and in that section studies from a range of societies could be discussed. Finally, I think the article is making great progress, congratulations to everyone involved and especially to righty007, who has made many of the edits. --Htw3 20:35, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have a good start here. You have definitely broadened the scope of the article and the tag at the top of the page should disappear soon. Some minor improvements are still needed.

• In the opening paragraph the term "assume" is a bit problematic. You may want to use a different term that more closely implies achievement- such as accopmlishes.

• You may want to be a bit more clear on your definition of ascribed status. Try to make a connection between this type of status and broader social forces. Your example is good, but try to add on a broader definition.

• The cultural capital section is good. You should probably note the theorist Pierre Bourdieu as he is commonly noted as the first person to conceive of this idea. You also might want to note how cultural capital is similiar to economic capital (specifically how differences in the control of cultural capital influence one's chances at upward mobility).

• Your section on education is a bit outdated. Certainly your material on industrialization is accurate but not as relevent in post industrial societies like the United States. You could update this by noting how the importance of technology- specifically computers- has changed what types of education are valued today.

• You need to cite your sources in the Employment section.

Otherwise, this is an excellent start. Great job.

--Velvet Llama 01:26, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for the feedback. I've updated the article with many of your suggestions. Righty007 06:25, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It is a position that is earned or chosen. Smallman12q (talk) 02:53, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Shepard, Jon (2003). Sociology and You. Ohio: Glencoe McGraw-Hill. pp. A-22. ISBN 0078285763. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Achieved status. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20090214011442/http://www.sociology-social-science.information-eg.com:80/sociology/achieved-status/ to http://www.sociology-social-science.information-eg.com/sociology/achieved-status/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 06:54, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Achieved status. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100308100024/http://www.glencoe.com/catalog/index.php/program?c=1675&s=21309&p=4213&parent=4526 to http://www.glencoe.com/catalog/index.php/program?c=1675&s=21309&p=4213&parent=4526

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:59, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]