This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Lancashire and Cumbria High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lancashire and Cumbria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lancashire and Cumbria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Lancashire and CumbriaWikipedia:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaTemplate:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaLancashire and Cumbria High This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale. Cities This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities UK geography Mid‑importance This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hey all, I'm the WikiProject Cities assessor of this article. If feedback is what you want and need, come to my talk page and give me a holler! --Starstriker7(^{Dime algo}_{or see my works}) 01:02, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi folks,

There's a distinct lack of images on the article at present. A good source is geograph.org.uk. I was thinking this image might want to take the infobox, or occupy the Governance section. --Jza84 |  Talk  19:22, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Accrington. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110604221023/http://www.cottontimes.co.uk/1826-03.htm to http://www.cottontimes.co.uk/1826-03.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130723011643/http://www.accringtonstanley.co.uk/index.php/commercial/crown to http://www.accringtonstanley.co.uk/index.php/commercial/crown

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:15, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Accrington. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121001073738/http://www.lancashire.gov.uk/environment/documents/historictowns/AccringtonComplete_LowRes.pdf to http://www.lancashire.gov.uk/environment/documents/historictowns/AccringtonComplete_LowRes.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:38, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

In the article, it says the population was 35K (as of 2011), but now in 2018, it's probably 3 or more times that amount. Can someone please update the population? The population of this place is way, WAY more than 35K. 92.17.190.188 (talk) 18:00, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comment, however so far as I an see, you are mistaken. The mid-2016 estimated population figure for the wider Hyndburn area is only 80,500 (less than 2.5 times that amount). As Accrington is the largest of 13 populated places listed in Hyndburn, another four of which are classified as towns, the Office for National Statistics figure seems plausible. Trappedinburnley (talk) 19:56, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]