Langbahn Team – Weltmeisterschaft

Talk:Abecedarian Early Intervention Project

Overview section incorrect

I believe the overview section is somewhat incorrect/incomplete. "One hundred-eleven infants were in the original sample; 104 took part in the follow up. Treatment was provided in 2 phases: during preschool and in the primary grades. Participants received either both phases, 1, but not both, or neither."[1]

References

  1. ^ Campbell, Frances A.; Ramey, Craig T.; Pungello, Elizabeth; Sparling, Joseph; Miller-Johnson, Shari (January 2002). "Early Childhood Education: Young Adult Outcomes From the Abecedarian Project". Applied Developmental Science. 6 (1): 42–57. doi:10.1207/S1532480XADS0601_05.

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on Abecedarian Early Intervention Project. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:28, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Abecedarian Early Intervention Project. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:13, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Developmental Psychology, January 18, 2012?

I am deleting the following: "(Most recent information from Developmental Psychology, January 18, 2012, cited in uncnews.unc.edu, January 19, 2012)".

I could not find the reference. It does not seem to add anything to this article. If you disagree, please provide a complete citation, so someone else can find it.

I'm replacing that comment with a citation to Joseph Sparling; Kimberly Meunier (24 July 2019). "Abecedarian: An Early Childhood Education Approach that has a Rich History and a Vibrant Present". International Journal of Early Childhood. 51: 207–216. ISSN 0020-7187. Wikidata Q120552586.

If you think that 2012 reference should be cited in this article, please provide a citation sufficient to allow someone to find it. Thanks, DavidMCEddy (talk) 19:30, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]