This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Video games This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks: Podcasting This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Podcasting, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of notable podcasts and podcast-related information on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PodcastingWikipedia:WikiProject PodcastingTemplate:WikiProject Podcastingpodcasting

I took issue with a few recent revisions, and in the interest of avoiding a full-on edit war over this, I figured I'd bring up a few points:

• Infobox

• The "ended" category is strictly for podcasts that have ceased production. As this show is still being produced, it is preferred to leave that blank.
• 1UP Yours is a gaming podcast, not a gaming journalism. It would only be considered a "gaming journalism" podcast if it strictly covered the subject of gaming journalism itself.
• The podcast itself has no rating, since there is no universal podcast rating system. Plus, even if there WERE a rating system, I hardly think that this show would be considered suitable for "all ages".

• History Section

• There is a distinct, if somewhat subtle difference between a "podcast" and "internet radio". In this case, the show is pre-recorded and edited, whereas internet radio is live, streaming content.
• The weekly outro is mostly unimportant and unnecessary in this article. Besides, the phrase is actually "Until next week, we're ghost", not "ghosts".

• Discussion Section

• 1UP Yours is a podcast predicated ENTIRELY on the discussion of games and the gaming subculture. However, there is no need to actually outline and recap these discussions within the article. It doesn't really have any encyclopedic merit, and to highlight the show's discussion angle is essentially to highlight the show itself, which is pretty much the goal of the article. But overall, these topics do not, in any way contribute to the overall makeup, structure, or history of the show itself, and therefore probably don't belong in the article.
• I have MAJOR problems with the tone of this phrase: "The show has been know to bring realism and respect to gaming journalism. Frequent guest and commentary from insiders like Mark Rein, Ted Price, and Dennis Dyack have brought forth ideas that go further than the mind of an average gamer." Not only does it have some serious POV problems, but there is no quantitative way to measure it's "realism" or "respect".

• Line-up Section

• I have no earthly idea why anyone is removing Phillip Kohlar and John Davidson from the line-up. Not only have they been appearing frequently over the past month or so, but it has actually been stated on the show itself that they would be periodic guest-hosts.

Again, I'm just trying to make the article better. If you have any problems with any of these specific edits, please bring them up here instead of simply reverting my edits again. Rwiggum (^Talk/_Contrib) 22:15, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

the show never really refers to having a line-up. In radio and news there is a panel comprised of individual's who contribute to the discussion as a whole. A line-up refers to a sports situation or a roster of sorts, that is why I am changing it back to Panel. Zaf263 (talk) 00:02, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree. A Panel incinuates something formal and informative. The phrase "line-up" actually HAS been used to describe the show, and it can refer to a vast number of meanings, not just sports. Rwiggum (^Talk/_Contrib) 00:04, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't change anythingZaf263 (talk) 01:21, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 4 Guys 1UP. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090505165511/http://kotaku.com:80/gaming/luke-smith/luke-smith-leaves-1up-for-bungie-gig-254153.php to http://kotaku.com/gaming/luke-smith/luke-smith-leaves-1up-for-bungie-gig-254153.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:34, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]