This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Medicine Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Science Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject ScienceTemplate:WikiProject Sciencescience Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hello, I recently noticed that a good deal of language I had written for this page was deleted, or altered drastically. Much of the edits seemed designed to remove any potentially negative information about the 340B drug discount program. I have replaced a good deal of my content, and reorganized the page in certain areas to clarify those items which are intended to shed light specifically about controversy over the program. My information is fully cited, and I believe should not be removed without justification. I think the page (and all pages) are improved if we are allowed to present all sides of an issue without anyone insisting on a single perspective.

Happy to discuss further, anytimeDc20001 (talk) 17:20, 10 June 2013 (UTC).[reply]

Thank you for engaging on the talk page. The content removed did not comply with Wikipedia's guidelines for reliable sources. An example of this is the section entitled "Impact on Clinical Decision-Making". I see that this was added back to the page. As noted, much of removed text was opinion based and/or related to current controversy over the program. Such content is not appropriate for inclusion in a Wikipedia article. WP:RSOPINION I urge those who are editing the article to keep it fact based and cited appropriately.

To review the specific reason for all edits made please view the notes in the article history tab.

518.WV (talk) 16:46, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]